On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:26:03 +0100
martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like a more general purpose utility, be it mergemaster or sth
> else. I like the way mergemaster works but I'd like to use it not
> only for /etc (after make) -- I'd like to point it to my backup
> directory which doesn't
martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> I'd like a more general purpose utility, be it mergemaster or sth else.
> I like the way mergemaster works but I'd like to use it not only for
> /etc (after make) -- I'd like to point it to my backup directory which
> doesn't co
Oliver Fromme wrote:
martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 1) I wonder if I could use mergemaster to compare 2 directories and
> > > merge differencies as neccessary. To explain: I have all config files I
> > > touch save
martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 1) I wonder if I could use mergemaster to compare 2 directories and
> > > merge differencies as neccessary. To explain: I have all config files I
> > > touch saved with full path somewh
Oliver Fromme wrote:
martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) I wonder if I could use mergemaster to compare 2 directories and
> merge differencies as neccessary. To explain: I have all config files I
> touch saved with full path somewhere in /root. And therefore I'd like
> mergemaster
martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) I wonder if I could use mergemaster to compare 2 directories and
> merge differencies as neccessary. To explain: I have all config files I
> touch saved with full path somewhere in /root. And therefore I'd like
> mergemaster or some other tool to c
Doug Barton wrote:
The generally accepted wisdom (which I am repeating because I agree with
it) is that when updating major versions you should:
1. Carefully back up your configuration files and data
2. Do a clean install of the new version
3. Update configuration files
4. Restore data
5. Re-in
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> in my experience, in usual kernel && userland upgrading is good,
> however, everytime port upgrading have problem, whenever new -REL is
> released ;; i usually do port upgrading by portupgrade(1).
>
> at once(when 6.2-REL was released) i did upgrading port by
> portupgrade
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 09:48 -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> > in my experience, in usual kernel && userland upgrading is good,
> > however, everytime port upgrading have problem, whenever new -REL is
> > released ;; i usually do port upgrading by portupgrade(1).
> >
> > at onc
in my experience, in usual kernel && userland upgrading is good,
however, everytime port upgrading have problem, whenever new -REL is
released ;; i usually do port upgrading by portupgrade(1).
at once(when 6.2-REL was released) i did upgrading port by
portupgrade(1) but i met failures on the upgra
10 matches
Mail list logo