On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:51:43PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
| on 27/07/2012 17:33 Andrew Boyer said the following:
| >
| > On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
| >
| >> For the time being I had to revert the following from my stable/9 tree.
| >> Otherwise I would get a kernel panic o
on 27/07/2012 17:33 Andrew Boyer said the following:
>
> On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
>> For the time being I had to revert the following from my stable/9 tree.
>> Otherwise I would get a kernel panic on shutdown from ipmi(4).
>>
>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisi
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Boyer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>>
For the time being I had to revert the following from my stable/9
On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>
>>> For the time being I had to revert the following from my stable/9 tree.
>>> Otherwise I would get a kernel panic on shutdown from
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Boyer wrote:
>
> On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
>> For the time being I had to revert the following from my stable/9 tree.
>> Otherwise I would get a kernel panic on shutdown from ipmi(4).
>>
>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&
On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> For the time being I had to revert the following from my stable/9 tree.
> Otherwise I would get a kernel panic on shutdown from ipmi(4).
>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=237839
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisio
For the time being I had to revert the following from my stable/9 tree.
Otherwise I would get a kernel panic on shutdown from ipmi(4).
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=237839
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=221121
I suspect that the ipmi device isn't det