Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:39:38AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote:
no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I
quote it:
I said to read the comments in the GENERIC kernel, not the handbook.
e.g. if you commented out SCSI support, you probably left in t
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:39:38AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote:
> no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I
> quote it:
I said to read the comments in the GENERIC kernel, not the handbook.
e.g. if you commented out SCSI support, you probably left in the USB
mass storage devi
no, I don't think so. I read carefully the handbook's section and I
quote it:
SCSI controllers. Comment out any you do not have in your system. If you
have an IDE only system, you can remove these altogether.
SCSI peripherals. Again, comment out any you do not have, or if you have only
IDE
har
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:23:16AM +0100, Ivan Roth wrote:
> I got problems when trying to compile my new kernel on 5.3-release. I
> didn't go to stable yet cause I never did it (really new to unix...) and
> I heard that it was better to customize the system first (?).
> But when I put a # before
I just try it again cause I didn't want to annoy anybody and it worked! (?)
I left the SCSI lines cause I use an iPod (and it seems to be an SCSI
drive inside).
I commented all the RAID lines and compilation succeeded.
Now can you tell me how to be sure that my kernel conf is optimized? I
attach
I got problems when trying to compile my new kernel on 5.3-release. I
didn't go to stable yet cause I never did it (really new to unix...) and
I heard that it was better to customize the system first (?).
But when I put a # before lines I don't need like all RAID and SCSI
options, kernel don't w
