My apologies, I clearly didn't copy the url from the right buffer, Mark
Linimon's Ports & Clang wiki is at http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang
Dewayne
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> Mark Linimon is monitoring the status of ports and clang at
> http://blog.vx.sk/archives/25-FreeBSD-Compiler-Benchmark-gcc-base-vs-gcc-ports-vs-clang.html
> Which might save you some work.
looks like benchmarks, not status of compilability/runability
randy
_
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman
> Sent: Tuesday, 29 May 2012 5:33 PM
> To: Randy Bush
> Cc: FreeBSD Stable
> Subject: Re: clang tautology
>
> On 29/05/2
>> is the clang build for releng_9 for amd64 in good enough shape that i
>> can simply
>> csup
>> hack make.conf
>> make buildworld
>> make kernel
>> boot single
>> make installworld
>> mergemaster -cviFU
>> reboot
this did work. i am now doing a portupgrade to see if i can break
On 29/05/2012 04:47, Randy Bush wrote:
> is the clang build for releng_9 for amd64 in good enough shape that i
> can simply
> csup
> hack make.conf
> make buildworld
> make kernel
> boot single
> make installworld
> mergemaster -cviFU
> reboot
>
> as if life was normal?
Pace Doug'
Good point Doug, I guess the choice between a clang 3.1 and gcc 4.2.1
world/kernel is pending a performance profile comparison. The performance
comparison using specific applications (ports) indicates some improvement
of gcc 4.6 over 4.2 and certainly gains when openMP is advantageous.
Regards,
On 2012-05-29 04:49, Randy Bush wrote:> trying a clang buildworld and get a
bunch of
>
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/config/i386/i386.md:4249:29:
> warning: self-comparison always evaluates to false [-Wtautological-compare]
> && (TARGET_64BIT || DImode != DIm
On 5/28/2012 8:47 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> and if i try to follow http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang
> i do not see where the clang world and kernel are actually made the
> normal bootable.
>
> is the clang build for releng_9 for amd64 in good enough shape that i
> can simply
> csup
and if i try to follow http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang
i do not see where the clang world and kernel are actually made the
normal bootable.
is the clang build for releng_9 for amd64 in good enough shape that i
can simply
csup
hack make.conf
make buildworld
make kernel
bo
and, for a bonus, clang buildworld ...
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/config/i386/i386.md:196:14:
note: use '=' to turn this equality comparison into an assignment
(ix86_tune)) == (
^~
=
randy
___
fre
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/config/i386/i386.md:4249:29:
> warning: self-comparison always evaluates to false [-Wtautological-compare]
> && (TARGET_64BIT || DImode != DImode))
>^
> 12 warnings generated.
apologies. releng
trying a clang buildworld and get a bunch of
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/config/i386/i386.md:4249:29:
warning: self-comparison always evaluates to false [-Wtautological-compare]
&& (TARGET_64BIT || DImode != DImode))
^
12 war
12 matches
Mail list logo
