On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:01:26 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about Re: broken re(4):
PY> > I already did simple benchmarking by using "dd if=/dev/zero
PY> > of=file" which gave me several 10s of MByte/s under all
PY> > circumstances. Can you
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 08:58:10AM +0200, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:22:28 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> about Re: broken re(4):
>
> PY> Before checking performance of network controller you had to rule
> PY> out other factor
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:22:28 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about Re: broken re(4):
PY> Before checking performance of network controller you had to rule
PY> out other factors like disk I/O. Use one of benchmark programs in
PY> ports/benchmark.
I already did simp
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 09:24:57AM +0200, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:43:04 +0200 Daniele Bastianini
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4):
>
> DB> > - copying large files (more than some 100MB) via ssh/scp drops the
> DB> > co
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:26:29 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4):
OF> > On the other hand, I have not been able to get more than about
OF> > 10MByte/s through the interfaces of this particular system. I have
OF> > 1GBit-netwo
Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On the other hand, I have not been able to get more than about 10MByte/s
> through the interfaces of this particular system. I have 1GBit-networking
> equipment, and the other systems (which are used as router) have no
> problem doing a throughput of >20MB/s. Even bonding t
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:43:04 +0200 Daniele Bastianini
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4):
DB> > - copying large files (more than some 100MB) via ssh/scp drops the
DB> > connection due to "corrupted MAC on input":
DB> > Disconnecting: Corrupted MAC o
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:26:44PM +0200, Daniele Bastianini wrote:
>
> Il giorno 27/mag/08, alle ore 16:52, Gerrit K?hn ha scritto:
>
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >I have four identical ITX boards from Jetway here, each having two
> >re(4)
> >onboard nics:
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:9:0: class
Il giorno 27/mag/08, alle ore 16:52, Gerrit Kühn ha scritto:
Hi folks,
I have four identical ITX boards from Jetway here, each having two
re(4)
onboard nics:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:9:0: class=0x02 card=0x10ec16f3 chip=0x816710ec
rev=0x10
hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Semiconductor'
Quoting Gerrit Khn, who wrote on Fri, May 30, 2008 at 02:47:59PM +0200 ..
> On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:49:24 +0200 Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote about Re: broken re(4):
>
> WB> > Typing "pci riser card jumper" in Google will give you
> WB> > many
On Fri, 30 May 2008 14:03:08 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about Re: broken re(4):
PY> Since you're running this patch would you post dmesg output related
PY> with re(4)? Also please post the output of "devinfo -rv | grep
PY> oui".
Here is my ou
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:44:43 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4):
OF> That rings a bell ...
OF> I remember reports of riser cards that apparently changed
OF> the timing on the PCI bus so they were only marginally
OF> compliant with the
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:49:24 +0200 Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about Re: broken re(4):
WB> > Typing "pci riser card jumper" in Google will give you
WB> > many more pages with interesting (or frightening) stuff
WB> > to read.
WB> Well, if you know ho
On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:44:43 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4):
OF> > Talking about this controller: This is also the only board I am
OF> > using with PCI cards (and thus with a PCI riser) at all. I remember
OF> > vaguely t
Quoting Oliver Fromme, who wrote on Fri, May 30, 2008 at 01:44:43PM +0200 ..
> Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> > As Oliver already suggested, I will take out the controller and see what
> > happens then.
> >
> > Talking about this controller: This is also the only board I am using with
> > PCI cards (an
Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> As Oliver already suggested, I will take out the controller and see what
> happens then.
>
> Talking about this controller: This is also the only board I am using with
> PCI cards (and thus with a PCI riser) at all. I remember vaguely that I
> had a few problems getting
On 2008-05-30 07:03, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> Since you're running this patch would you post dmesg output related
> with re(4)? Also please post the output of "devinfo -rv | grep
> oui".
dmesg
--
Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:10:48PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2008-05-29 11:58, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
> > Can I do anything else? Is the newer patch (from yesterday) in your
> > directory above worth giving a try?
>
> FYI, that patch doesn't compile, due to a typo... Fix below:
>
> ---
On Thu, 29 May 2008 19:09:12 +0200 Dimitry Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about Re: broken re(4):
DA> > I have 5 ITX systems, each with 2 re-NICs, and only one is behaving
DA> > strange.
DA> Just as a data point, my ITX board is a JetWay J7F4K1G2E.
The ones I have are J
On Thu, 29 May 2008 18:52:55 +0200 (CEST) Oliver Fromme
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4):
OF> In that case I would suspect that the one piece of hardware
OF> that is misbehaving is broken and needs to be replaced.
I agree. I just do not know yet which part is broken.
On 2008-05-29 17:13, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008 13:10:48 +0200 Dimitry Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Meanwhile I have set up two more machines. Now I have 5 ITX systems, each
> with 2 re-NICs, and only one is behaving strange.
Just as a data point, my ITX board is a JetWay J7F4K1G2E.
Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> Meanwhile I have set up two more machines. Now I have 5 ITX systems,
> each with 2 re-NICs, and only one is behaving strange.
In that case I would suspect that the one piece of hardware
that is misbehaving is broken and needs to be replaced.
> The only hardware thing that
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerrit Kühn
>Sent: Thursday, 29 May 2008 7:58 PM
>To: Gerrit Kühn
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: broken re(4)
>
>On Wed, 28 May 2008 17:56:10 +
Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2008 11:45:19 -0400 Michael Proto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote about Re: broken re(4):
>
> MP> > Any hints what I should do next to find the culprit?
>
> MP> I'm running 6.3 on the exact same Jetway board at home, and wh
On Thu, 29 May 2008 13:10:48 +0200 Dimitry Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about Re: broken re(4):
DA> FYI, that patch doesn't compile, due to a typo... Fix below:
Thanks, I will try that patch tomorrow.
Meanwhile I have set up two more machines. Now I have 5 ITX systems, each
On Thu, 29 May 2008 23:03:01 +1000 "Dewayne Geraghty"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about RE: broken re(4):
DG> You might try, after rebooting, to physically unplug and replug your
DG> networking cables.
I already did try that one or twice, without any success.
DG> I h
On 2008-05-29 11:58, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> Can I do anything else? Is the newer patch (from yesterday) in your
> directory above worth giving a try?
FYI, that patch doesn't compile, due to a typo... Fix below:
--- re.HEAD.20080528.orig 2008-05-29 13:08:15.0 +0200
+++ re.HEAD.20080528
On Wed, 28 May 2008 17:56:10 +0200 Gerrit Kühn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: broken re(4):
GK> PY> http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.HEAD.20080519
GK> Somehow the two interfaces seem to interfer with each other. Can I
GK> provide further information for fixing
On Tue, 27 May 2008 11:45:19 -0400 Michael Proto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about Re: broken re(4):
MP> > Any hints what I should do next to find the culprit?
MP> I'm running 6.3 on the exact same Jetway board at home, and while I
MP> haven't been bitten by the D
On Wed, 28 May 2008 09:28:23 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about Re: broken re(4):
PY> > Any hints what I should do next to find the culprit?
PY> There were similiar reports on this issue. It seems that it's very
PY> hard to make re(4) work so many RTL8
On Wed, 28 May 2008 09:28:23 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about Re: broken re(4):
PY> > Any hints what I should do next to find the culprit?
PY> There were similiar reports on this issue. It seems that it's very
PY> hard to make re(4) work so many RTL8
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 04:52:32PM +0200, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have four identical ITX boards from Jetway here, each having two re(4)
> onboard nics:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:9:0: class=0x02 card=0x10ec16f3 chip=0x816710ec
> rev=0x10
> hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Realtek Se
32 matches
Mail list logo
