On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 07:44:56PM -0700, Richard Stanaford wrote:
> Recently.
>
> I did a successful upgrade from 4.0-RELEASE to STABLE on the DX4/100 just last
> week. The changes to binutils had been committed for some time I believe.
After watching days of this from various people, I decide
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 05:20:29PM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> Could someone please offer a brief explanation about the nature of
> the change to the binutils?
Binutils 2.10.0 now accepts (read requires) proper AT&T ASM syntax.
Previous versions required a bastardized syntax that was neither p
Richard Stanaford wrote:
>
> --- Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I am doing this on a 336MHz Celeron. I did a clean upgrade to STABLE from
> > > 4.0-RELEASE on my DX4/100 box and I did use the quotes without difficulty.
> >
> > Recently or before 7 July. My first build was on
--- Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am doing this on a 336MHz Celeron. I did a clean upgrade to STABLE from
> > 4.0-RELEASE on my DX4/100 box and I did use the quotes without difficulty.
>
> Recently or before 7 July. My first build was on a P-II 400 and it is
> only slightly fast
Richard Stanaford wrote:
>
> --- Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just to make sure that from /usr/src you are doing a
> >
> > make installkernel KERNEL=NOVA
>
> I may have used ..
>
> make buildkernel KERNEL="NOVA"
The quotes are evil. One my first kernel I left if buildkernel
--- Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to make sure that from /usr/src you are doing a
>
> make installkernel KERNEL=NOVA
I may have used ..
make buildkernel KERNEL="NOVA"
If the quotes are evil I would have expected it to make more than just 'as'
mad. I'm going to CVSup, bu
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:58:06AM -0400, Keith Mackay wrote:
> Is there a known issue in bioscall.s?
Yes, it has been documented all over the place in this mailing list.
It is also documented in /usr/src/UPDATING.
You should review the expectations of running -STABLE and consider if you