Re: two questions about autofs on FBSD

but doesn't work in FBSD. I haven't had a chance to try -t nullfs yet but I'm going to bet it doesn't work in Linux. Then there's omnios ... > Executing "automount" will refresh top-level mounts (ie all the filesystems > of type "autofs"); running

Re: two questions about autofs on FBSD

On 0103T1602, Lee Damon wrote: > I am (reluctantly) replacing am-utils (amd) with autofs. To do this I > need to replace a lot of functionality that I've had embedded for a very > long time and which my users absolutely rely on. I have two (so far) > questions that I need to s

two questions about autofs on FBSD

I am (reluctantly) replacing am-utils (amd) with autofs. To do this I need to replace a lot of functionality that I've had embedded for a very long time and which my users absolutely rely on. I have two (so far) questions that I need to solve before I can proceed with this process. Quest

Re: Interaction between make & autofs/automountd

om map -hosts, path /net/, prefix "/net", > > key "share", options "nosuid,intr" > > automountd: parsing map "-hosts" > > automountd: executing "/etc/autofs/special_hosts share" as pid 12717 > > RPC: Unknown host > &

Re: Interaction between make & autofs/automountd

On 0404T0549, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:28:49AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > > ... > > A couple of the machines use autofs & automountd to make the ports tree > > available on demand. (In the case of the 3rd, I manually mount it when >

Re: Interaction between make & autofs/automountd

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:28:49AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > A couple of the machines use autofs & automountd to make the ports tree > available on demand. (In the case of the 3rd, I manually mount it when > needed, but that's not at issue for this note, an

Interaction between make & autofs/automountd

/10 (amd64): the build machine is updated daily, and is thus updated to r293654; the other 2 machines are only updated weekly, so they are presently updated to r293620. A couple of the machines use autofs & automountd to make the ports tree available on demand. (In the case of the 3rd, I manually

AUTOFS (automount) and NFS server not playing together nicely

At the risk of being dubbed insane, here goes: On five FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p9 production servers autofs(5) is enabled and working as advertised. On the same servers nfs v3 clients are also fat, dumb and happy. On a test server where autofs(5) is also enabled and working well, I am testing nfs

amd/autofs

Hi! What is a status of autofs (in the context of AMD) in FreeBSD these days? Eugene Grosbein ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-uns

Re: autofs

Dmitriy Kirhlarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm find in source tree : > /usr/src/lib/libautofs > /usr/src/sbin/mount_autofs > /usr/src/share/examples/autofs > /usr/src/share/man/man5/autofs.5 > > Sorry, for stupid question. > Could somebody explain me, ho

autofs

Hi, list. I'm find in source tree : /usr/src/lib/libautofs /usr/src/sbin/mount_autofs /usr/src/share/examples/autofs /usr/src/share/man/man5/autofs.5 Sorry, for stupid question. Could somebody explain me, how I can build it and why it doesn't build by default? WB

RE: autofs

Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote on Fri 10.06.2005 14:34 > Why autofs was exclude from FreeBSD? google says: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2004-September/000737.html http://freebsdaddicts.org/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=1042 --- 8< ---

autofs

Hi, list. Why autofs was exclude from FreeBSD? By. Dmitriy ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"