On Saturday 29 April 2006 20:00, Sam Leffler wrote:
> JoaoBR wrote:
> > the 5,3 and 5.8Ghz range is gone
> >
> >
> > this card should show the 2.4b/g range as usual, the 4.9, the 5.3 and the
> > 5.8 range
>
> regdomain 18 gives you b/g channels 1-11 and public safety channels in
> the range 4942-4
JoaoBR wrote:
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 01:02, Sam Leffler wrote:
Attached are two patches; one for the ath driver and another for
sys/net80211/ieee80211.c in releng6 (note changes to the latter in head
are different). I believe this will resolve your problem; you can check
by updating your c
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 01:02, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Attached are two patches; one for the ath driver and another for
> sys/net80211/ieee80211.c in releng6 (note changes to the latter in head
> are different). I believe this will resolve your problem; you can check
> by updating your code and l
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 12:52, Sam Leffler wrote:
>
> No. releng5 has an older hal that does not even support regdomain 18.
> Backporting work to releng5 would be a massive effort for very little
> gain; anyone that truly wants wireless support should be running 6.x or
> later.
>
ok and agree
JoaoBR wrote:
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 01:02, Sam Leffler wrote:
Attached are two patches; one for the ath driver and another for
sys/net80211/ieee80211.c in releng6 (note changes to the latter in head
aplies clean and compiles on i386 and amd64, I need to reset some cards to
0x12 to see i
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 01:02, Sam Leffler wrote:
>
> Attached are two patches; one for the ath driver and another for
> sys/net80211/ieee80211.c in releng6 (note changes to the latter in head
aplies clean and compiles on i386 and amd64, I need to reset some cards to
0x12 to see if it works a
Douglas Berry wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:36:56 PDT, Sam Leffler wrote:
flags 0x3e0 = Passive+5Ghz+2Ghz+OFDM+CCK
hal flags 0x140 = 5Ghz+OFDM
Both of these make no sense for a frequency of 2432 Mhz, hence the hal
got upset.
Thanks for the interpretation.
What are the regulatory domain setti
Douglas Berry wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:36:56 PDT, Sam Leffler wrote:
flags 0x3e0 = Passive+5Ghz+2Ghz+OFDM+CCK
hal flags 0x140 = 5Ghz+OFDM
Both of these make no sense for a frequency of 2432 Mhz, hence the hal
got upset.
Thanks for the interpretation.
What are the regulatory domain setti
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:36:56 PDT, Sam Leffler wrote:
> flags 0x3e0 = Passive+5Ghz+2Ghz+OFDM+CCK
> hal flags 0x140 = 5Ghz+OFDM
> Both of these make no sense for a frequency of 2432 Mhz, hence the hal
> got upset.
Thanks for the interpretation.
> What are the regulatory domain settings for the car
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 17:52, Sam Leffler wrote:
> JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 April 2006 17:45, Sam Leffler wrote:
> >> JoaoBR wrote:
> >>> you do not need to patch if_ath.c anymore on releng_6|5 only change the
> >>> eprom setting
> >>
> >> There should be no need to change the eeprom setti
JoaoBR wrote:
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 17:17, Douglas Berry wrote:
Dlink DWL-AG530 can't scan, can't connect.
ifconfig ath0 up ; ifconfig ath0 list scan
returns nothing. On the same machine, same 'net, a different ath
card works (TRENDnet TEW-503PI).
Does anyone have this Dlink card working on
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 17:17, Douglas Berry wrote:
> Dlink DWL-AG530 can't scan, can't connect.
> ifconfig ath0 up ; ifconfig ath0 list scan
> returns nothing. On the same machine, same 'net, a different ath
> card works (TRENDnet TEW-503PI).
>
> Does anyone have this Dlink card working on RELENG
robing on driver added
ath0: ath_chan_set: unable to reset channel 5 (2432 Mhz, flags 0x3e0 hal flags
0x140)
flags 0x3e0 = Passive+5Ghz+2Ghz+OFDM+CCK
hal flags 0x140 = 5Ghz+OFDM
Both of these make no sense for a frequency of 2432 Mhz, hence the hal
got upset.
What are the regulatory domain settings for
h_chan_set: unable to reset channel 5 (2432 Mhz, flags 0x3e0 hal flags
0x140)
Thanks for tips,
doug
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
14 matches
Mail list logo
