If the pool is created as v28 in FreeBSD, then you will be able to import
the pool into Solaris 10 or 11 without any issues.
Just be sure to ignore all the "your pool is outdated messages", and do
*NOT* upgrade your pool to ZFSv32 in Solaris. If you do that, you will not
be able to import the poo
eived correctly on the second machine.
I'm mostly sure that you wouldn't lose your data, however Solaris is
staying with ZFS v28 since the last release and FreeBSD is progressing
slowly with Illumos. I'm pretty sure that 9-STABLE is already using ZFS
feats and any pool created
Hi.
Is the FreeBSD v28 zfs fully compatible with solaris zfs ? I need to
switch disks between servers, these disks are SAN disks, and it's about
20T of data. I don't want to lose them. I am aware that our zfs is
compatible with Solaris, but I just want to be sure, like really really
sure. Of cours
>
>> Any help tracking this down would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>
> There have been numerous changes to v28 in -STABLE since June.
> Can you reproduce the behavior with a recent build of -STABLE instead of
> -RELEASE? Perhaps even on -CURRENT?
>
I can sure give that a try.
I'm 95% sure my ZFS c
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:50:26 -0500, Dave Cundiff
wrote:
Any help tracking this down would be greatly appreciated.
There have been numerous changes to v28 in -STABLE since June.
Can you reproduce the behavior with a recent build of -STABLE instead of
-RELEASE? Perhaps even on -CURRENT?
Re
Hello,
I'm running ZFS V28 with 8.2-RELEASE. Its a stock system patched with
the following
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/releng-8.2-zfsv28-20110616.patch.xz
https://www.illumos.org/attachments/292/txg.c.patch
The zfsv28 patch did have a failed hunk in
/usr/src/sys/cddl/c
Hi!
It seems, I've found a bug in the ZFS v28 on the latest stable:
if we have a snapshot with some files having an extended attributes,
then attempt to read an extended attributes's value leads to a well
reproducible kernel panic.
The part of backtrace follows:
#6 0x8
Thanks a lot
On Tuesday 26 July 2011, Martin Matuska wrote:
> Dňa 22. 7. 2011 9:48, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote / napísal(a):
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just updated to 8.2S and zfs v28 and notice strange thing: in the
manual i
> > can read about aclmode but i can
Dňa 22. 7. 2011 9:48, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote / napísal(a):
> Hi all,
>
> I just updated to 8.2S and zfs v28 and notice strange thing: in the manual i
> can read about aclmode but i can not use it in the real life:
>
> # zfs set aclmode=passthrough data/public
> cannot s
Hi all,
I just updated to 8.2S and zfs v28 and notice strange thing: in the manual i
can read about aclmode but i can not use it in the real life:
# zfs set aclmode=passthrough data/public
cannot set property for 'data/public': invalid property 'aclmode'
Obsolete manual?
On Jun 10, 2011, at 17:24, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Dedup can require a huge amount of RAM, or a dedicated L2ARC SSD, depending
> on the size of your storage. You should not enable it unless you are
> prepared for the consequences.
Under OpenSolaris, each tracking entry for a deduped block (wh
On Jun 10, 2011, at 17:25, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Am I missing something? How about using fletcher[24] for dedup?
Fletcher is fairly weak as things go, and so even though two checksums are the
same, there's a decent chance that the data is actually different. At least
with recent releases
06.06.2011 13:53, Martin Matuska написав(ла):
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
New major features:
- data deduplication
Am I missing something? How about using fletcher[24] for dedup?
--
Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
_
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
We tried using dedup on one of our systems, but within 10-15 minutes
turned it off. I believe the added CPU overhead of dedup was causing
the system to act "bursty" in other non-ZFS-related tasks; e.g. turn on
dedup, then in a SSH window hold down the
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
> I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
Follow-up, since we're gradually upgrading our ZFS-based RELENG_8
servers to ZFSv28. Committers/those involved should see my very last
paragraph.
First, server upgrades:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Marius Strobl
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
>>
>> New major features:
>>
>> - data deduplication
>> - triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3)
>> - zfs diff
>> -
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Marius Strobl
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:46:19AM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Marius Strobl
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I have merged ZFS version 28
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 12:46:19AM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Marius Strobl
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
> >>
> >> New major features:
> >
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
>
> New major features:
>
> - data deduplication
> - triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3)
> - zfs diff
> - zpool split
> - snapshot holds
> - zpool import -F. Allows to re
Thanks. Everything works fine.
2011/6/6 Lystopad Olexandr :
> Hello, Martin Matuska!
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200
> m...@freebsd.org wrote about "HEADS UP: ZFS v28 merged to 8-STABLE":
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STAB
Hello, Martin Matuska!
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200
m...@freebsd.org wrote about "HEADS UP: ZFS v28 merged to 8-STABLE":
> Hi,
>
> I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
finally! Thanks!
My home server works ok with this update.
--
On 06/06/11 06:53, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
New major features:
- data deduplication
- triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3)
- zfs diff
- zpool split
- snapshot holds
- zpool import -F. Allows to rewind corrupted pool to earlier
transaction
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:53:11PM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
>
> New major features:
>
> - data deduplication
> - triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3)
> - zfs diff
> - zpool split
> - snapshot holds
> - zpool import -F. Allows to re
Hi,
I have merged ZFS version 28 to 8-STABLE (revision 222741)
New major features:
- data deduplication
- triple parity RAIDZ (RAIDZ3)
- zfs diff
- zpool split
- snapshot holds
- zpool import -F. Allows to rewind corrupted pool to earlier
transaction group
- possibility to import pool in read-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon Meßner wrote:
| On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
|> I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be MFC to 8-Stable or not.
|
| On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
|> I was won
I think that at this point it takes more than a patch. That is way I am
asking if there is a plan to MFC to 8-Stable.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Leon Meßner
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
> > I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
> I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be MFC to 8-Stable or not.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0300, George Kontostanos wrote:
> I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be MFC to 8-Stable or not.
Is there a recent
I was wondering if ZFS v28 is going to be MFC to 8-Stable or not.
Regards,
--
George Kontostanos
aisecure.net <http://www.aisecure.net>
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsub
nal Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Forgeron
> Sent: December-31-10 6:01 PM
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: ZFS v28 and zil_disable
>
> BTW, I'm noticing the removal of vfs.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Chris Forgeron wrote:
> BTW, I'm noticing the removal of vfs.zfs.zil_disable as well - It's not
> listed as a sysctl when I check vfs.zfs, but I see it's still in the source
> code;
>
> In usr/src/sys/cddl/ :
> # grep -r zil_disable *
> cddl/contrib/opensolaris/u
d.org
Subject: ZFS v28 and zil_disable
BTW, I'm noticing the removal of vfs.zfs.zil_disable as well - It's not listed
as a sysctl when I check vfs.zfs, but I see it's still in the source code;
In usr/src/sys/cddl/ :
# grep -r zil_disable *
cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/s
BTW, I'm noticing the removal of vfs.zfs.zil_disable as well - It's not listed
as a sysctl when I check vfs.zfs, but I see it's still in the source code;
In usr/src/sys/cddl/ :
# grep -r zil_disable *
cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sys/zil.h.orig:extern int
zil_disable;
cddl/contrib/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/22/2010 08:48, ciaby wrote:
> P.S. Can i remove the SSD ZIL without upgrading the pool?
Simply put `NO'
Longer answer, ZFS will complain at the point where you try to replace
the log device or remove it and tell you it was formatted using an ol
I just downloaded and installed the latest zfs v28 patch (this one:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20101218.patch.xz).
System boots fine, a 4-disks RAIDZ set get mounted properly, no
problems so far.
Thanks a lot to all the FreeBSD community for this great piece of
34 matches
Mail list logo
