Hi.
On 19.12.2016 11:51, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin
> wrote:
>> I tried the UEFI boot sequence on a Supermicro server. It boots only
>> manually, gives some cryptic error while booting automatically. When
>> entering the path to the EFI loader in a
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 16.12.2016 22:08, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
>> I am reading uefi(8) and it looks like FreeBSD 11 should be able to boot
>> using UEFI straight into ZFS, so I am thinking of converting that
>> freebsd-boot partition to an
Hi.
On 16.12.2016 22:08, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> I am reading uefi(8) and it looks like FreeBSD 11 should be able to boot
> using UEFI straight into ZFS, so I am thinking of converting that
> freebsd-boot partition to an EFI partition, creating a FAT filesystem and
> copying /boot/boot.ef
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 12/16/2016 11:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 06:08:34PM +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
Hi everyone,
A few months ago I got myself a new box and I have been happily running
FreeBSD on it ever since. I noticed that the
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 12/16/2016 11:08, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
Hi everyone,
A few months ago I got myself a new box and I have been happily running
FreeBSD on it ever since. I noticed that the boot was not as fast as I had
expected and I've realized that, while
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2016, at 23:56, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> ...
>>> Yes, this is almost exactly what I have done on a machine that was
>>> originally installed with gptzfsboot on the first p
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Fernando Herrero Carrón
wrote:
> * While getting to FreeBSD's loader seems a bit faster (or maybe that's
> just confirmation bias), bringing up the system does not seem much faster.
>
Aside from working around some buggy boot BIOSes, the main speedup would be
not
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Fernando Herrero Carrón
wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what other functionality will UEFI provide that
> takes up 50M?
>
Multiple UEFI programs for diagnostics and such, possibly including
standalone repair images.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Fernando Herrero Carrón
wrote:
>
> My understanding is that BIOSes still boot through kind of a legacy 32-bit
> path and UEFI boots straight 64-bit with all the bells and whistles. In
> fact:
Actually, they boot through a legacy 16 bit path, with access to only
On 16 Dec 2016, at 23:56, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
>> Yes, this is almost exactly what I have done on a machine that was
>> originally installed with gptzfsboot on the first partition, which was
>> 512K. Since all the partitions on this
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 10:49:48 +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> > Am 17.12.2016 um 07:12 schrieb Ian Smith :
> >
> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:08:34 +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> >> My only reason for wanting to boot with UEFI is faster boot,
> >> everything is working fine otherwise.
> >
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 05:12:13PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:08:34 +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
>
> Hi,
>
> you've had plenty of helpful responses, but nobody has commented on:
>
> > My only reason for wanting to boot with UEFI is faster boot,
> Am 17.12.2016 um 07:12 schrieb Ian Smith :
>
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:08:34 +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
>> My only reason for wanting to boot with UEFI is faster boot,
>> everything is working fine otherwise.
>
> I'm skeptical that UEFI boot would be any or noticeably faster than vi
2016-12-17 9:21 GMT+01:00 Fernando Herrero Carrón :
>
>
> 2016-12-16 23:56 GMT+01:00 Warner Losh :
>
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> > On 16 Dec 2016, at 18:53, Antony Uspensky wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
>> >>> On 12/16/2016 11:39,
2016-12-17 7:12 GMT+01:00 Ian Smith :
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:08:34 +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
>
> Hi,
>
> you've had plenty of helpful responses, but nobody has commented on:
>
> > My only reason for wanting to boot with UEFI is faster boot,
> > everything is worki
2016-12-16 23:56 GMT+01:00 Warner Losh :
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 16 Dec 2016, at 18:53, Antony Uspensky wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> >>> On 12/16/2016 11:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 06:08:3
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 18:08:34 +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> Hi everyone,
Hi,
you've had plenty of helpful responses, but nobody has commented on:
> My only reason for wanting to boot with UEFI is faster boot,
> everything is working fine otherwise.
I'm skeptical that UEFI boot woul
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2016, at 18:53, Antony Uspensky wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
>>> On 12/16/2016 11:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 06:08:34PM +0100, Fernando Herrero Carr?n wrote:
> Hi eve
On 16 Dec 2016, at 18:53, Antony Uspensky wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
>> On 12/16/2016 11:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 06:08:34PM +0100, Fernando Herrero Carr?n wrote:
Hi everyone,
A few months ago I got myself a new box and I
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
On 12/16/2016 11:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 06:08:34PM +0100, Fernando Herrero Carr?n wrote:
Hi everyone,
A few months ago I got myself a new box and I have been happily running
FreeBSD on it ever since. I noticed that the
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:43:18AM -0600, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
> On 12/16/2016 11:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 06:08:34PM +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> A few months ago I got myself a new box and I have been happily running
> >
On 12/16/2016 11:39, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 06:08:34PM +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> A few months ago I got myself a new box and I have been happily running
>> FreeBSD on it ever since. I noticed that the boot was not as fast as I had
>>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 06:08:34PM +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> A few months ago I got myself a new box and I have been happily running
> FreeBSD on it ever since. I noticed that the boot was not as fast as I had
> expected and I've realized that, while my disk is GPT
On 12/16/2016 11:08, Fernando Herrero Carrón wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> A few months ago I got myself a new box and I have been happily running
> FreeBSD on it ever since. I noticed that the boot was not as fast as I had
> expected and I've realized that, while my disk is GPT partitioned, the boot
Hi everyone,
A few months ago I got myself a new box and I have been happily running
FreeBSD on it ever since. I noticed that the boot was not as fast as I had
expected and I've realized that, while my disk is GPT partitioned, the boot
process is still BIOS based:
% gpart show
=> 34 976773
25 matches
Mail list logo
