RE: Updating world with least downtime

2002-09-04 Thread Sameer R. Manek
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Oberman > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 2:11 PM > To: Jack L. Stone > Cc: Brooks Davis; David W. Chapman Jr.; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Updating world with least downtime

Re: Updating world with least downtime

2002-09-01 Thread Kevin Oberman
This is far different from just rushing through things and risking s disaster. It is, as the subject of the thread states, "Updating world with least downtime". I like the idea of an "early-run" using -D, though. I might do that next time I update a system. Should be even fa

Re: Updating world with least downtime

2002-08-30 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > For a modern system and a reasonable disk, this is trivial. I have a > system which MUST not be down for over 15 minutes and I can do it > quite easily unless I really fumble something in mergemaster. I do > always merge a few files later and tend to