On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I suspect that most VB users on FreeBSD use it to get access to a small
> number of took on Windows...the ones in Office. It's still better than
> either LibreOffice or OpenOffice.org for either documents or presentations,
> especially presen
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
> > Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:20:51 +0100
> > schrieb "Ronald Klop" :
> > > BTW: My experience with VBox is that it is nice for hobby stuff, but
> > > not for heavy load server
Ronald Klop wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:11:51 +0100, Martin Sugioarto
wrote:
Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:20:51 +0100
schrieb "Ronald Klop" :
Hi,
As I understand it.
Host: FreeBSD 9
Guest: WinXP
Which one has troubles with its clock? The host or the guest or both?
Hi,
only inside VirtualBo
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
> Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:20:51 +0100
> schrieb "Ronald Klop" :
> > Do you run NTP on the guest XP also? If yes, turn it off.
>
> Windows XP default installation (synch'ed to time.windows.com).
> Switching this off, does not have any
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:11:51 +0100, Martin Sugioarto
wrote:
Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:20:51 +0100
schrieb "Ronald Klop" :
Hi,
As I understand it.
Host: FreeBSD 9
Guest: WinXP
Which one has troubles with its clock? The host or the guest or both?
Hi,
only inside VirtualBox, I think it's onl
On 01/21/12 15:20, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:30:53 +0200
schrieb Alexander Motin:
I am not using VirtualBox right now, so I'll need to setup it to test
this. Meanwhile you could try to experiment with switching to
different timecounters and eventtimers. May be some change in
Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:30:53 +0200
schrieb Alexander Motin :
Hi Alexander,
> I am not using VirtualBox right now, so I'll need to setup it to test
> this. Meanwhile you could try to experiment with switching to
> different timecounters and eventtimers. May be some change in 9.0
> changed default
Am Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:20:51 +0100
schrieb "Ronald Klop" :
> Hi,
>
> As I understand it.
> Host: FreeBSD 9
> Guest: WinXP
>
> Which one has troubles with its clock? The host or the guest or both?
Hi,
only inside VirtualBox, I think it's only an application problem and
my emails would be probab
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:18:42 +0100, Martin Sugioarto
wrote:
Am Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:50:49 +0100
schrieb Martin Sugioarto :
I can confirm this on VirtualBox. I've been running WinXP inside
VirtualBox and measured network I/O during downloads. It showed me
very high download rates (around 800k
Hi.
On 01/21/12 11:18, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
Am Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:50:49 +0100
schrieb Martin Sugioarto:
I can confirm this on VirtualBox. I've been running WinXP inside
VirtualBox and measured network I/O during downloads. It showed me
very high download rates (around 800kB/s) while it's p
Am Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:50:49 +0100
schrieb Martin Sugioarto :
> I can confirm this on VirtualBox. I've been running WinXP inside
> VirtualBox and measured network I/O during downloads. It showed me
> very high download rates (around 800kB/s) while it's physically
> possible to download 200kB/s thr
On Friday, January 20, 2012 2:29:21 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. if you have a _reproducable_ case for this, mav@ needs to see it ASAP.
>
> The trouble is that mav@ isn't handed reproducable cases and thus can't
> debug it.
>
> If you can supply some kind of box that provides this as a reproducabl
.. if you have a _reproducable_ case for this, mav@ needs to see it ASAP.
The trouble is that mav@ isn't handed reproducable cases and thus can't
debug it.
If you can supply some kind of box that provides this as a reproducable
issue, we can get it fixed ASAP. Otherwise it's a case of "can't repr
Joe Holden wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jan 19, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Joe Holden wrote:
Sounds like you were looking for commercial support, since unpaid
volunteers don't have an obligation to promptly leap out and provide
solutions within your ETA.
Not really, just an acknowledgement would be f
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jan 19, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Joe Holden wrote:
Sounds like you were looking for commercial support, since unpaid volunteers
don't have an obligation to promptly leap out and provide solutions within your
ETA.
Not really, just an acknowledgement would be fine. It is what
On Jan 19, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Joe Holden wrote:
>> Sounds like you were looking for commercial support, since unpaid volunteers
>> don't have an obligation to promptly leap out and provide solutions within
>> your ETA.
>
> Not really, just an acknowledgement would be fine. It is what it is,
>
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jan 19, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Joe Holden wrote:
Looks like this is down to the dynamic/tickless changes in 9 (that aren't even
noted in the release notes), the machines have now been switched to linux as
the lack of responses/care given to my recent postings has been noted
On Jan 19, 2012, at 12:04 PM, Joe Holden wrote:
> Looks like this is down to the dynamic/tickless changes in 9 (that aren't
> even noted in the release notes), the machines have now been switched to
> linux as the lack of responses/care given to my recent postings has been
> noted and it was dee
Looks like this is down to the dynamic/tickless changes in 9 (that
aren't even noted in the release notes), the machines have now been
switched to linux as the lack of responses/care given to my recent
postings has been noted and it was deemed that using linux would be less
hassle in the long r
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 20:12 +, Joe Holden wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Has anyone else noticed the tendency for 9.0-R to be unable to
> accurately keep time? I've got a couple of machines that have been
> upgraded from 8.2 that are struggling, in particular a Virtual box guest
> that was fine on
Am Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:12:51 +
schrieb Joe Holden :
> Hi guys,
>
> Has anyone else noticed the tendency for 9.0-R to be unable to
> accurately keep time? I've got a couple of machines that have been
> upgraded from 8.2 that are struggling, in particular a Virtual box
> guest that was fine
Hi guys,
Has anyone else noticed the tendency for 9.0-R to be unable to
accurately keep time? I've got a couple of machines that have been
upgraded from 8.2 that are struggling, in particular a Virtual box guest
that was fine on 8.2, but now that's its been upgraded to 9.0 counts at
anything
22 matches
Mail list logo
