Hey Doug,
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 12:57:01 -0800 (PST), Doug White
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote:
>
> > > > In other words, exactly the same thing. I should also note that
> > > > earlier versions of 5-CURRENT worked correctly (-CURRENT from june 7).
> > > >
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:07:05 -0800 (PST), Doug White
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote:
> (...)
> >
> > The rate on 'clk' should be 1000, so it looks like your system doesn't
> > like HZ=1000. Try sticking th
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:07:05 -0800 (PST), Doug White
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote:
(...)
>
> The rate on 'clk' should be 1000, so it looks like your system doesn't
> like HZ=1000. Try sticking this in loader.conf and rebooting:
>
> kern.hz="100"
>
> If
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote:
>
> OK, here it is:
>
> interrupt total rate
> irq1: atkbd0 2 0
> irq6: fdc010 0
> irq8: rtc1140653127
> irq13: npx0
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:14:35 -0800 (PST), Doug White
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a weird problem on a dual Xeon 550MHz system running
> > 5.3-RELEASE. Everything takes twice as long as it should.
> >
> > Example:
> > winst
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a weird problem on a dual Xeon 550MHz system running
> 5.3-RELEASE. Everything takes twice as long as it should.
>
> Example:
> winston% time sleep 2
> sleep 2 0.00s user 0.00s system 0% cpu 4.006 total
>
> The same for pings, the scsi
Hi,
I have a weird problem on a dual Xeon 550MHz system running
5.3-RELEASE. Everything takes twice as long as it should.
Example:
winston% time sleep 2
sleep 2 0.00s user 0.00s system 0% cpu 4.006 total
The same for pings, the scsi delay when booting, etc. The time of the
system itself doesn't
