Re: TP-LINK TL-WN321G

2018-11-08 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
= 0x bMaxPacketSize0 = 0x0040 idVendor = 0x148f idProduct = 0x5370 This is indeed a Ralink RT5370, so run(4) as it attached. There seem to be at least 4 versions of the “TP-LINK TL-WN321G” all being Ralink chips. Earlier versions were indeed Ralink RT25xx based it seems, which is rum(4

Re: TP-LINK TL-WN321G

2018-10-27 Thread tech-lists
On 27/10/2018 18:50, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: The problem with these dongles is that sometimes there’s a rev A and a rev B which use entirely different chipsets and hence are entirely different drivers.  That is rarely observable from online shopping sites or even product packaging.   I haven’t ch

Re: TP-LINK TL-WN321G

2018-10-27 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 27 Oct 2018, at 16:01, tech-lists wrote: Hi, context: 12-stable amd64 When TP-LINK TL-WN321G usb dongle is inserted, this appears in dmesg: ugen1.3: at usbus1 .. run0: MAC/BBP RT5390 (rev 0x0502), RF RT5370 (MIMO 1T1R), address [REDACTED] .. and run0 appears, and works, yet: rum(4

TP-LINK TL-WN321G

2018-10-27 Thread tech-lists
Hi, context: 12-stable amd64 When TP-LINK TL-WN321G usb dongle is inserted, this appears in dmesg: ugen1.3: at usbus1 run0 numa-domain 0 on uhub3 run0: <1.0> on usbus1 run0: MAC/BBP RT5390 (rev 0x0502), RF RT5370 (MIMO 1T1R), address [REDACTED] but run(4) says it supports these: TP-L