On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 07:37:05PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On 2008-Oct-19 11:39:02 +0300, Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I have built myself a looping 'ps -axl' which should let me gather more
> >> information if it does re-appear. (In the proce
Sorry for the late reply.
On 2008-Oct-19 11:39:02 +0300, Kostik Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have built myself a looping 'ps -axl' which should let me gather more
>> information if it does re-appear. (In the process, I've found that ps
>> leaks memory, though that's not a problem unti
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 02:21:04PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2008-Oct-15 21:37:36 +0100, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Peter, there was a bug causing dump to hang (completely unrelated to
> >UFS2 snapshot generation) merged to RELENG_7 a month or so ago. Can you
> >try updati
On 2008-Oct-15 21:37:36 +0100, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Peter, there was a bug causing dump to hang (completely unrelated to
>UFS2 snapshot generation) merged to RELENG_7 a month or so ago. Can you
>try updating?
Well, dump wasn't hanging, rather it was hanging the rest of the
On 10/15/08, Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081015 12:00] wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps a 'show locks' with an 8-CURRENT kernel with WITNESS enabled
>> will shed light on the problem? As most of the filesystem locking
>> doesn't use lockmgr in 7-STABLE
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Has anyone else seen anything similar?
It's a known problem documented in my Wiki -- see "dump/restore". Note
the part about UFS2 snapshot generation. I'm almost certain this is
what you're describing.
I don't know how you can say this so confidently without even comp
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081015 12:00] wrote:
>
> Perhaps a 'show locks' with an 8-CURRENT kernel with WITNESS enabled
> will shed light on the problem? As most of the filesystem locking
> doesn't use lockmgr in 7-STABLE, it would be silent with that kernel.
I might be wrong here,
>> Based on progress reports from both dump and my fifo process, the
>> snapshot removal began about 10 hours _after_ the system froze
>> (during this time, dump wrote about 143GB). Given the timeline,
>> it's fairly clear that neither mksnap_ffs nor the 'rm snapshot'
>> were running at the time t
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:48:09PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2008-Oct-15 02:08:48 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:58:43PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >> On 2008-Oct-15 01:35:38 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Oct
On 2008-Oct-15 02:08:48 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:58:43PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> On 2008-Oct-15 01:35:38 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> >> Last night, I
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:58:43PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2008-Oct-15 01:35:38 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >> Last night, I attempted a full, compressed backup of my 181GB /home
> >> (on a PATA disk) t
On 2008-Oct-15 01:35:38 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> Last night, I attempted a full, compressed backup of my 181GB /home
>> (on a PATA disk) to a remote system. The backup started at 2159 and
>> everything appea
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Last night, I attempted a full, compressed backup of my 181GB /home
> (on a PATA disk) to a remote system. The backup started at 2159 and
> everything appeared normal until about 0040 when the system became
> non-responsive and this l
Last night, I attempted a full, compressed backup of my 181GB /home
(on a PATA disk) to a remote system. The backup started at 2159 and
everything appeared normal until about 0040 when the system became
non-responsive and this lasted until the dump completed at 1033. This
is the first full backup
14 matches
Mail list logo