On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 05:08:10PM +0100, Greg Byshenk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> > The rest of the below information is good -- but I'm confused about
> > something: is there anyone out there who can use mksnap_ffs on a
> > filesystem (/usr is a
I'll just chime in briefly. I contacted Jeremy off the list
about this issue a few days ago. I have one spare box i386
sitting here that I can happily test patches against; if I
can be of help, let me know.
> uname -a
FreeBSD localhost.localdomain 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0:
Tue N
Kostik Belousov writes:
| On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:45:14AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[snip]
| > If he can press Control-T, it means SIGINFO can be sent to the
| > mksnap_ffs process, and the process responds with that information. So,
| > the system is not deadlocked -- meaning, I be
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> The rest of the below information is good -- but I'm confused about
> something: is there anyone out there who can use mksnap_ffs on a
> filesystem (/usr is a good test source) and NOT experience this
> deadlocking problem? Liter
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:45:14AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:26:42PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:26:42PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > > > I've been playing around with
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:05:21PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:02:50PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > > > > > I've b
Jeremy,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > > > I run the mksnap_ffs
(moving my thread from -fs to -stable)
Before touching anything, here's a description of the symptoms I
see... Rather busy system, with quite a bit of filesystem activity
occurring while the snapshot is being made. Quad CPU amd64 box with
16GB of ram, 6x10Krpm RAID array. Should be reason
On 2008-Nov-12 20:47:37 -0800, Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I plan to commit it tomorrow since I sent it to Tim to test. The 10 can
>be tuned but it has kept a bunch of machines at work up. Glad people
>don't think it is that it is to wrong :-) It probably could be made
>a little
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick, who wrote on Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800 ..
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > > > I've been playi
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:02:50PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > ...
> > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > > > > I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem
> > > > >
Kostik Belousov writes:
| On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 07:49:28PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
| > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
| > > I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later
| > > the system completely freezes up:
| > >
| > > paladin# cd /u2/.sna
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> ...
> > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > > > I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on
> > > > one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64:
> > > >
> > > > FreeBSD paladi
Jeremy Chadwick writes:
[snip]
| The rest of the below information is good -- but I'm confused about
| something: is there anyone out there who can use mksnap_ffs on a
| filesystem (/usr is a good test source) and NOT experience this
| deadlocking problem? Literally *every* FreeBSD box I h
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > > I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on
> > > one of my servers runni
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on
> > one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64:
> >
> > FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 07:49:28PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> > I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later
> > the system completely freezes up:
> >
> > paladin# cd /u2/.snap/
> > paladin# mksnap_ffs /u2 test.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later
> the system completely freezes up:
>
> paladin# cd /u2/.snap/
> paladin# mksnap_ffs /u2 test.1
Someone (not named because they choose not to reply to the list) gave
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on
> one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64:
>
> FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10 20:49:51
> GMT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ob
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 06:22:35PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:10:50PM +0200, David Peall wrote:
> > > FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10
> > > 20:49:51 GMT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PALADIN amd64
> > >
> > > I run the
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:10:50PM +0200, David Peall wrote:
> > FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10
> > 20:49:51 GMT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PALADIN amd64
> >
> > I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later
> > the sy
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Bishop
> Sent: 12 November 2008 07:58 PM
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs
>
> Fre
I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on
one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64:
FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10 20:49:51
GMT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PALADIN amd64
I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the
25 matches
Mail list logo
