Re: Svnsup architecture

2013-01-27 Thread John Mehr
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:49:08 +0100 Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > Disclaimer: I am trying to go inside the technicalities >of the SVN > protocol. I am not sure whether this sub-thread should >belong to this > list or to another; I am open to suggestions on this >topic. >

Re: Svnsup architecture

2013-01-27 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Disclaimer: I am trying to go inside the technicalities of the SVN protocol. I am not sure whether this sub-thread should belong to this list or to another; I am open to suggestions on this topic. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 07:40:45PM -0600, John Mehr wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:42:19 +0100 Arri

Re: Svnsup architecture [was: Re: svn - but smaller?]

2013-01-25 Thread John Mehr
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:42:19 +0100  Arrigo Marchiori wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:57:17AM -0800, 'Jeremy 1- svnsup-distill: takes a revision from svn and creates a text file (called a delta) that represents it. It seems to be almost complete. To answer one of John Mehr's prob

Re: Svnsup architecture [was: Re: svn - but smaller?]

2013-01-25 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2013-Jan-25 13:42:19 +0100, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: >The current svnsup design is composed of: > > 1- svnsup-distill: takes a revision from svn and creates a text file >(called a delta) that represents it. It seems to be almost >complete. > > 2- svnsup-apply: takes a delta generated by

Svnsup architecture [was: Re: svn - but smaller?]

2013-01-25 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:57:17AM -0800, 'Jeremy Chadwick' wrote: [...] > Also, just as a footnote point to readers: please do not bring up > svnsup. Until it's stated by some official FreeBSD person that > "{committers} are actively working on this and bringing it into the base > system so peop