Hi!
I have just noticed this strange thing:
% top
last pid: 50566; load averages: 0.28, 0.26, 0.23 up 1+18:25:52 16:48:31
90 processes: 3 running, 87 sleeping
CPU states: 4.3% user, 0.0% nice, 6.2% system, 1.9% interrupt, 87.5% idle
Mem: 315M Active, 39M Inact, 120M Wired, 18M Cache, 60M Buf, 98
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> top(1) could check the width of the display and tailor the display to
> that width. May screen based tools already do this and it provides a lot
> of flexibility. It's best to check the width for width on every update
> so that the screen (if its a soft terminal) may be incr
> Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 19:40:43 +0300
> From: Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 2005-05-12 09:33, Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 5/12/05, Tuomo Latto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Dominic Marks wrote:
> This includes at least the followin
On 5/12/2005 10:21 AM, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Jonathan Noack wrote:
I think you will have a very hard time removing anything from top
because someone will always pipe up and say, "I've been using
since the days when computers were measured in
MILLIhertz... *shaking fist*" Why not add an option to
On 2005-05-12 09:43, Jonathan Noack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 5/12/2005 8:12 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>On 2005-05-12 13:49, Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ When the view is toggled between processes/threads, the NTHR part
becomes the thread ID of the particular thre
On 2005-05-12 09:33, Scot Hetzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 5/12/05, Tuomo Latto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Dominic Marks wrote:
This includes at least the following changes (some not visible):
+ The entire header line is limited to the window width too.
+ The USERNAME co
Hello!
In message to sent Wed, 11 May 2005 13:50:07
+0100 you wrote:
>> Ah, yes! Good thought. This could affect the width of the USERNAME
>> column and push everything too far to the right. If this is the case,
>> I'd probably vote for optionally limiting the length of the username
>> column
On Thu, 12 May 2005 17:21:18 +0200, Matthias Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jonathan Noack wrote:
I think you will have a very hard time removing anything from top
because someone will always pipe up and say, "I've been using
since the days when computers were measured in
MILLIhertz... *shaking
Jonathan Noack wrote:
> I think you will have a very hard time removing anything from top
> because someone will always pipe up and say, "I've been using
> since the days when computers were measured in
> MILLIhertz... *shaking fist*" Why not add an option to switch between
> SIZE and RES? Perh
On 5/12/2005 9:58 AM, Matthias Buelow wrote:
Jonathan Noack wrote:
What happens if the command is long enough to overrun the screen? Is
the thread information truncated and lost? I believe this was the
argument for making a separate column for the thread info.
How about leaving either SIZE or RES
Jonathan Noack wrote:
> What happens if the command is long enough to overrun the screen? Is
> the thread information truncated and lost? I believe this was the
> argument for making a separate column for the thread info.
How about leaving either SIZE or RES out, the one which makes less sense
On 5/12/2005 8:12 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-05-12 13:49, Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 12 May 2005 11:39, you wrote:
That's an option too. I'm currently trying to get top to display
something like this (80 columns are used for text, so use a slightly
wider termina
On 5/12/05, Tuomo Latto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dominic Marks wrote:
> >>This includes at least the following changes (some not visible):
> >>
> >> + The entire header line is limited to the window width too.
> >> + The USERNAME column is hard-limited to 8 characters.
> ...
> > If this behav
On Thursday 12 May 2005 14:13, Tuomo Latto wrote:
> Dominic Marks wrote:
> >>This includes at least the following changes (some not visible):
> >>
> >> + The entire header line is limited to the window width too.
> >> + The USERNAME column is hard-limited to 8 characters.
>
> ...
>
> > I suppose
Dominic Marks wrote:
This includes at least the following changes (some not visible):
+ The entire header line is limited to the window width too.
+ The USERNAME column is hard-limited to 8 characters.
...
I suppose it could be argued that using usernames of that format is a poor
choice on my pa
On 2005-05-12 13:49, Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thursday 12 May 2005 11:39, you wrote:
>> That's an option too. I'm currently trying to get top to display
>> something like this (80 columns are used for text, so use a slightly
>> wider terminal to view this properly:
>>
>> --
On Thursday 12 May 2005 11:39, you wrote:
> On 2005-05-11 13:50, Gavin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Ah, yes! Good thought. This could affect the width of the USERNAME
> >> column and push everything too far to the right. If this is the case,
> >> I'd probably vote for optionally limi
On 2005-05-11 13:50, Gavin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ah, yes! Good thought. This could affect the width of the USERNAME
>> column and push everything too far to the right. If this is the case,
>> I'd probably vote for optionally limiting the length of the username
>> column to, say,
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 18:26 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2005-05-10 10:41, Andre Guibert de Bruet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 May 2005, Skip Ford wrote:
> > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU
> > > COMM
> > >AND
> > >1352 skip
19 matches
Mail list logo
