Another DNS (not MS) server answers NXDomain instead of SERVFAIL on
'? kalmar.' query.
And then sendmail asks for A. Email works
There are two ways obviously:
1. Change sendmail behaviour, i.e. make it ask for A record just after
first query for . Like in 9.1-RELEASE.
2. Make MS DNS answer
So, sendmail is broken? Or libraries which sendmail uses to resolv names?
2013/8/5 Pavel Timofeev :
> Hmm. SERVFAIL comes because of not full dns name. Kalmar. instead of
> kalmar.ocs.ru.
>
> 2013/8/5 Pavel Timofeev :
>> Got some new info. I read this
>> https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/
Hmm. SERVFAIL comes because of not full dns name. Kalmar. instead of
kalmar.ocs.ru.
2013/8/5 Pavel Timofeev :
> Got some new info. I read this
> https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2006-August/063528.html
> Perhaps, the problem because our MS DNS server returns SERVFAIL on query.
> It
Got some new info. I read this
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2006-August/063528.html
Perhaps, the problem because our MS DNS server returns SERVFAIL on query.
It happens in case of often queries. It's 9.2-RC1:
14:59:50.973445 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.29244 > hercules.xxx.ru.d
Same thing on RELENG/9.2
2013/8/3 Pavel Timofeev :
> 2013/8/2 Ruben de Groot :
>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:54:08PM +0400, Pavel Timofeev typed:
>>> I've just installed new fresh 9.2-BETA2 amd64 on another machine.
>>> Same behaviour - Sendmail asks DNS only for record of mx server.
>>> We d
2013/8/2 Ruben de Groot :
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:54:08PM +0400, Pavel Timofeev typed:
>> I've just installed new fresh 9.2-BETA2 amd64 on another machine.
>> Same behaviour - Sendmail asks DNS only for record of mx server.
>> We don't use IPv6 in our company.
>>
>> 2013/7/31 Pavel Timofe
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:54:08PM +0400, Pavel Timofeev typed:
> I've just installed new fresh 9.2-BETA2 amd64 on another machine.
> Same behaviour - Sendmail asks DNS only for record of mx server.
> We don't use IPv6 in our company.
>
> 2013/7/31 Pavel Timofeev :
> > I wanted to say that se
Here is dig output of our domain
root@test:/etc/mail # dig xxx.ru IN MX
; <<>> DiG 9.8.4-P2 <<>> xxx.ru IN MX
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 39091
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; QUESTION SECTI
I'm sorry(
So resolver is MS server.
But does it matter when it works good with 9.1 and doesn't work with 9.2?
What I have to do for investigation?
2013/8/1 Kimmo Paasiala :
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>> Ok, I understand. Thanks a lot for excelent explanation. Mayb
Forgot to send to list as well
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> Ok, I understand. Thanks a lot for excelent explanation. Maybe
> sendmail ignores additional section?
>
> I use _default_ fresh system, so resolver is _default_ bind.
> For investigation I've just installed
Ok, I understand. Thanks a lot for excelent explanation. Maybe
sendmail ignores additional section?
I use _default_ fresh system, so resolver is _default_ bind.
For investigation I've just installed fresh 9.1-RELEASE amd64, email
delivery works and picture looks different than on 9.2:
14:30:45.06
On 01/08/2013 09:41, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> to Matthew Seaman
> No luck
>
> root@test:/etc/mail # grep ip /etc/rc.conf
> #ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="NO"
> #ipv6_network_interfaces="none"
> ip6addrctl_enable="YES"
> ip6addrctl_policy="ipv4_prefer"
>
> root@test:/etc/mail # ip6addrctl
> Prefix
to Matthew Seaman
No luck
root@test:/etc/mail # grep ip /etc/rc.conf
#ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="NO"
#ipv6_network_interfaces="none"
ip6addrctl_enable="YES"
ip6addrctl_policy="ipv4_prefer"
root@test:/etc/mail # ip6addrctl
Prefix Prec Label Use
::1/128
On 01/08/2013 08:41, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> Or I did it wrong?
Yes. This:
> ip6addrctl_enable="NO"
You need to turn the ip6addrctl function *on* before you can set the
policy to prefer ipv4.
Cheers,
Matthew
___
freebsd-stable@freebs
I tried, but it didn't work.
# grep ip /etc/rc.conf
ipv6_activate_all_interfaces="NO"
ipv6_network_interfaces="none"
ip6addrctl_enable="NO"
ip6addrctl_policy="ipv4_prefer"
# ip6addrctl show
no source-address-selection policy is installed
Or I did it wrong?
2013/7/31 J David :
> On Wed, Jul 31, 20
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> I've just installed new fresh 9.2-BETA2 amd64 on another machine.
> Same behavior - Sendmail asks DNS only for record of mx server.
We also noticed one of our machines suddenly started using IPv6 to
send outbound email (from Postfix ra
I've just installed new fresh 9.2-BETA2 amd64 on another machine.
Same behaviour - Sendmail asks DNS only for record of mx server.
We don't use IPv6 in our company.
2013/7/31 Pavel Timofeev :
> I wanted to say that sendmail asks only (IPv6) record of mx
> server, but not A (IPv4).
> Any
On 31/07/2013 13:24, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> I wanted to say that sendmail asks only (IPv6) record of mx
> server, but not A (IPv4).
> Any ideas?
ip6addrctl(8) perhaps?
Also check /etc/rc.d/ip6addrctl and the variables used by that script in
/etc/defaults/rc.conf which you can use to set pre
I wanted to say that sendmail asks only (IPv6) record of mx
server, but not A (IPv4).
Any ideas?
2013/7/31 Pavel Timofeev :
> Looks like my sendmail uses only IPv6 to resolve mx server dns name to
> ip address.
>
> 14:59:50.793338 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.19032 > hercules.xxx.ru.domain:
> 53417+ A
Looks like my sendmail uses only IPv6 to resolve mx server dns name to
ip address.
14:59:50.793338 IP reticulum.xxx.ru.19032 > hercules.xxx.ru.domain:
53417+ ? xxx.ru. (24)
[13/98]
14:59:50.793662 IP hercules.xxx.ru.domain > reticulum.xxx.ru.1
As I can see official intruction for upgrading says to do three times
of freebsd-update install (between reboots).
But I did two because at third time my system says
No updates are available to install.
Run '/usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch' first.
2013/7/30 Pavel Timofeev :
> Sorry, I've already re
Sorry, I've already realised that double relay's ip address in log in normal.
Anyway, problem is still here.
2013/7/30 Pavel Timofeev :
> Hello everyone!
> I've just upgraded (binary) my server from FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE amd64
> to 9.2-BETA2.
> And my sendmail can't resolv any hostname. It says:
> J
Hello everyone!
I've just upgraded (binary) my server from FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE amd64
to 9.2-BETA2.
And my sendmail can't resolv any hostname. It says:
Jul 30 17:28:54 reticulum sm-mta[3191]: r6UCqeun016122:
to=, ctladdr= (1001/1001),
delay=00:36:14, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=300348,
relay=
23 matches
Mail list logo
