Rasputin wrote:
>
>
> Wierd. I only built jdk12 a fortnight ago, and it was fine.
> You're the second person to mention problems to me in the past few days.
> Maybe Sun changed the tarball?
>
Are you suggesting that they were able to change the tarball and have it
keep the same MD5 checksum?
* Robert Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 16:40]:
> Hi there,
>
> I don't think that I downloaded the wrong one.
> There are three src' to download... one tar ball and two zip's...
>
> 1. jdk1_2_2-src.tar.gz
> 2. jdk1_2_2-L-src-linux-09_Mar.zip
> 3. jdk1_2_2-src.zip
>
> And I use nr 1. .
Hi there,
I don't think that I downloaded the wrong one.
There are three src' to download... one tar ball and two zip's...
1. jdk1_2_2-src.tar.gz
2. jdk1_2_2-L-src-linux-09_Mar.zip
3. jdk1_2_2-src.zip
And I use nr 1. . I think that the zip contains the Win src's or
not???
--Robert
Raspu
* Robert Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010504 16:27]:
> Hi there,
>
> Here is the output that I get when trying to make the jdk 12 beta
> port it's about the last piece of the message saying c:\temp and
> xcopy... any clues???
You've downloaded the wrong tarball? This looks like the NT versio
Hi there,
Here is the output that I get when trying to make the jdk 12 beta
port it's about the last piece of the message saying c:\temp and
xcopy... any clues???
Thanks and have a nice weekend
--Robert
root@daemon:/usr/ports/java/jdk12-beta # make
===> Extracting for jdk-1.2.2b10
>> Chec
