On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 06:48:52PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Hmm, finaly I noted this thread. There is one more patch in the
pipeline for 7 that is needed, as I was told. Testing of that patch
seems to be
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:37:56 +0200, Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No audio often means libflashsupport can't find all lib dependencies.
I had noticed that a couple of dependencies were, in fact, missing.
Your email was very timely - I was just going to figure out how to
get them.
On Thursday 16 October 2008 22:23:27 J.R. Oldroyd wrote:
> It works here, although my 7-stable is a few days old and I applied
> the linprocfs.c patch by hand.
>
> I also used the pre-compiled libflashsupport.so binary referred to in
> the thread.
>
> Then used nspluginwrapper to add links for na
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 06:48:52PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >Hmm, finaly I noted this thread. There is one more patch in the
> >pipeline for 7 that is needed, as I was told. Testing of that patch
> >seems to be stalled, so I am interested in th
Quoting "Sean C. Farley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Hmm, finaly I noted this thread. There is one more patch in the
pipeline for 7 that is needed, as I was told. Testing of that patch
seems to be stalled, so I am interested in the feedback.
Possible rejec
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Hmm, finaly I noted this thread. There is one more patch in the
pipeline for 7 that is needed, as I was told. Testing of that patch
seems to be stalled, so I am interested in the feedback.
Possible rejects of the $FreeBSD$ chunks are fine.
This patc
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, at 16:52:35 -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> I had something like that until I smacked my forehead after a few
> hours and realized I had not added linprocfs to /etc/fstab. That may
> be your problem at least with nspluginwrapper.
>
> Sean
linprocfs was indeed not mounted, so
> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:25:37 -0500
> From: Mark Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008, at 22:28:58 +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > Patches have been committed to CURRENT and should have been MFC'ed
> > last weekend, but haven't for some reason.
> >
> > The port has a PR waiting
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Mark Kane wrote:
*snip*
I also tried nspluginwrapper this time with native Firefox 3 as J.R.
said. It doesn't crash like the Linux Firefoxes but hangs the browser
for a couple minutes (eventually does recover, but Flash doesn't play)
and these appear on the terminal:
-
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, at 23:05:26 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 02:25:37PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm using RELENG_7 as of yesterday which appears to have the
> > linprocfs fixes from CURRENT, and I also updated linux-flashplayer9
> > with the patch from
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 02:25:37PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008, at 22:28:58 +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > Patches have been committed to CURRENT and should have been MFC'ed
> > last weekend, but haven't for some reason.
> >
> > The port has a PR waiting for maintainer feedbac
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:25:37 -0500, Mark Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm using RELENG_7 as of yesterday which appears to have the linprocfs
> fixes from CURRENT, and I also updated linux-flashplayer9 with the
> patch from the above PR.
>
> When trying to use Flash 9 in linux-opera a few Fl
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 02:25:37PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008, at 22:28:58 +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > Patches have been committed to CURRENT and should have been MFC'ed
> > last weekend, but haven't for some reason.
> >
> > The port has a PR waiting for maintainer feedbac
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008, at 22:28:58 +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> Patches have been committed to CURRENT and should have been MFC'ed
> last weekend, but haven't for some reason.
>
> The port has a PR waiting for maintainer feedback:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=127839
>
> The relev
> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:06:41 -0500
> From: eculp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Quoting Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >> From: Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:28:58 +0200
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 14 October 2008 20:30:47 Kevin Oberm
Quoting Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From: Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:28:58 +0200
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 20:30:47 Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I have seen some messages that imply that flashplugin9 might be usable
> on STABLE. The port is sill marked IGNORE
> From: Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:28:58 +0200
>
> On Tuesday 14 October 2008 20:30:47 Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > I have seen some messages that imply that flashplugin9 might be usable
> > on STABLE. The port is sill marked IGNORE, though:
> > ** Port marked as IG
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 20:30:47 Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I have seen some messages that imply that flashplugin9 might be usable
> on STABLE. The port is sill marked IGNORE, though:
> ** Port marked as IGNORE: www/linux-flashplugin9:
> Unstable, no sound, generally unusable state
>
> I also
On 10/14/08, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen some messages that imply that flashplugin9 might be usable
> on STABLE. The port is sill marked IGNORE, though:
> ** Port marked as IGNORE: www/linux-flashplugin9:
> Unstable, no sound, generally unusable state
>
Maybe, but
I have seen some messages that imply that flashplugin9 might be usable
on STABLE. The port is sill marked IGNORE, though:
** Port marked as IGNORE: www/linux-flashplugin9:
Unstable, no sound, generally unusable state
I also thought that there might be a solution to the sound issue.
Can an
20 matches
Mail list logo
