Re: Serious (ha-ha) bug in 4.9-RELEASE

2003-11-04 Thread Darryl Okahata
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Very critical indeed... And with such a huge userbase that it took six > > months before anybody noticed this problem. :-) > > No, we noticed it here at work where we use Sun Solaris > boxes as our development systems. I didn't know what the > prob

Re: Serious (ha-ha) bug in 4.9-RELEASE

2003-11-04 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:49:36AM -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > Brian T. Schellenberger wrote: > > > > > > >OTOH, the fact that nobody seems to have noticed until after 4.9 was > > >released is a pretty strong argument that not very many people

Re: Serious (ha-ha) bug in 4.9-RELEASE

2003-11-04 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:49:36AM -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Brian T. Schellenberger wrote: > > > >OTOH, the fact that nobody seems to have noticed until after 4.9 was > >released is a pretty strong argument that not very many people > >care--unless of course :-) > > Ag! It wa

Re: Serious (ha-ha) bug in 4.9-RELEASE

2003-11-04 Thread Michael Sierchio
Brian T. Schellenberger wrote: OTOH, the fact that nobody seems to have noticed until after 4.9 was released is a pretty strong argument that not very many people care--unless of course :-) Ag! It was a stupid fscking idea to make arbitrary changes to something that hadn't really chan

Re: Serious (ha-ha) bug in 4.9-RELEASE

2003-11-04 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:37:05AM -0500, Brian T. Schellenberger wrote: > > > > On Monday 03 November 2003 07:06 pm, Erik Trulsson wrote: > | On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:50:57PM -0800, Chris Pressey wrote: > | > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 00:17:26 +0100 > | > > | > Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot