Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-15 Thread Gregory Shapiro
The change of default has been committed to HEAD and will be MFC'ed in the next day or two. Likewise, UPDATING from HEAD has been updated with: 20150615: The fix for the issue described in the 20150614 sendmail entry below has been been committed in revision 284436. The work

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-15 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Frank Seltzer wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jun 2015, Gregory Shapiro wrote: > > I created it per your instructions. See above about it not existing >>> previously. >>> >> >> Oh, sorry for the confusion. Seems an emergency patch is in order to >> change the default. >> >

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-15 Thread Frank Seltzer
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015, Gregory Shapiro wrote: I created it per your instructions. See above about it not existing previously. Oh, sorry for the confusion. Seems an emergency patch is in order to change the default. Would you be willing to test this patch (apply, build, install, remove dh.pa

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Gregory Shapiro
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 08:23:33PM -0700, Gregory Shapiro wrote: > > I created it per your instructions. See above about it not existing > > previously. > > Oh, sorry for the confusion. Seems an emergency patch is in order to change > the default. For now, I've add an UPDATING entry: +2015061

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Gregory Shapiro
> I created it per your instructions. See above about it not existing > previously. Oh, sorry for the confusion. Seems an emergency patch is in order to change the default. Would you be willing to test this patch (apply, build, install, remove dh.params file, and restart)? The patch changes

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Frank Seltzer
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015, Gregory Shapiro wrote: After the update I got your email and followed your instructions, except for moving dh.param because it didn't exist, and sendmail is happy now. Happy to hear sendmail is happy. I checked and there is still no mention of this in /usr/src/UPDATING s

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Gregory Shapiro
> After the update I got your email and followed your instructions, except for > moving dh.param because it didn't exist, and sendmail is happy now. Happy to hear sendmail is happy. > I checked and there is still no mention of this in /usr/src/UPDATING so my > question is, when and how is dh.para

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Karl Denninger
On 6/14/2015 19:21, Frank Seltzer wrote: > I updated source and rebuilt world and kernel with no change in > sendmail's behavior. This is the revision I have now: > > root@Ace:/etc/mail/certs # svnlite info /usr/src/ > Path: /usr/src > Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src > URL: svn://ace/src/stable/1

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Frank Seltzer
I updated source and rebuilt world and kernel with no change in sendmail's behavior. This is the revision I have now: root@Ace:/etc/mail/certs # svnlite info /usr/src/ Path: /usr/src Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src URL: svn://ace/src/stable/10 Relative URL: ^/stable/10 Repository Root: svn://a

Re: dhparam (was: sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296)

2015-06-14 Thread Claus Assmann
BTW: You can check the file using: $ openssl dhparam -C < dhparam.pem | fgrep get_dh DH *get_dh768() ^^^ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "f

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Gregory Shapiro
> # DHParameters (only required if DSA/DH is used) > O DHParameters=/etc/mail/certs/dh.param > > # DHParameters (only required if DSA/DH is used) > O DHParameters=/etc/mail/certs/dh.param > > Again, default values, no changes to the installed files made. Try recreating those -- I'm not exactly s

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Frank Seltzer
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015, Gregory Shapiro wrote: The new OpenSSL eliminated small DHParam support. That leaves two possibilities: 1. The remote side you are talking to is using a small value. The best thing to do would be to eliminate the DH ciphers from your settings. See the docs for the Cip

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Gregory Shapiro
> Jun 14 00:50:04 Ace sm-msp-queue[79406]: STARTTLS=client, error: connect > failed=-1, reason=dh key too small, SSL_error=1, errno=0, retry=-1 > Jun 14 00:50:04 Ace sm-msp-queue[79406]: ruleset=tls_server, arg1=SOFTWARE, > relay=[127.0.0.1], reject=403 4.7.0 TLS handshake. The new OpenSSL elimi

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Esa Karkkainen
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:57:13AM -0400, Frank Seltzer wrote: > Am I the only one seeing this? Nope, I had the same issues after upgading from 10.1-RELEASE-p10 to 10.1-RELEASE-p12 using freebsd-update. I fixed this in my home enviroment by disabling TLS in sendmail.cf, by commenting e.g. adding

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 14/06/2015 10:57, Frank Seltzer wrote: > Because of a recent alert I updated both of my FreeBSD computers (both > running 10.1-STABLE and built from /etc/src) to r284296 and am having a > problem with sendmail. Sendmail is giving me the following error every > 30 minutes: > > Jun 14 09:50:04 Ac

Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Frank Seltzer
I didn't get any hits from a mailing list search and there is no mail or sendmail list so I am sending it here because stable is what I'm running. Because of a recent alert I updated both of my FreeBSD computers (both running 10.1-STABLE and built from /etc/src) to r284296 and am having a prob