On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 23:28:38 +0200
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> > Am 07.09.2017 um 23:13 schrieb Priyadarshana Chandrasena :
> >
> > I have not installed FreeBSD using iLo and virtual CD method. I will read
> > about this method and try it out.
>
>
>
> You will need an iLO license for that.
I h
> Am 07.09.2017 um 23:13 schrieb Priyadarshana Chandrasena :
>
> I have not installed FreeBSD using iLo and virtual CD method. I will read
> about this method and try it out.
You will need an iLO license for that.
Also, enjoy Gen10 servers, where even more features are going to be
„pay-for
Subject: Re: HP Smart array P440 support
On Sun, 3 Sep 2017 21:19:08 +0200
Maciej Suszko wrote:
> "Priyadarshana Chandrasena" wrote:
> > I have HP DL20 Gen 9 server. But I can not install FreeBSD 10.2 in
> > it. I have a HP smart array P440 in my server. I can not find
On Sun, 3 Sep 2017 21:19:08 +0200
Maciej Suszko wrote:
> "Priyadarshana Chandrasena" wrote:
> > I have HP DL20 Gen 9 server. But I can not install FreeBSD 10.2 in
> > it. I have a HP smart array P440 in my server. I can not find out
> > anywhere if ciss driver s
e usb UEFI when I create the usb boot
> disk?.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Maciej Suszko [mailto:mac...@suszko.eu]
> Sent: Monday, 4 September 2017 4:49 AM
> To: Priyadarshana Chandrasena
> Cc: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.org
> Subject: Re: HP Smart array P440 suppor
Behalf Of Warner Losh
Sent: Monday, 4 September 2017 12:26 PM
To: Priyadarshana Chandrasena
Cc: Maciej Suszko; FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List
Subject: Re: HP Smart array P440 support
I maintain that it's wrong.
However, to make progress, what version of the BIOS is it? What motherboard?
What
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 10:40:11 +0930
"Priyadarshana Chandrasena" wrote:
> I tried to install 11.1 but I still have the same error. UEFI boot mode does
> not see my usb bootable media as of type UEFI. So still the Legacy BIOS is
> the only option. Do I need to create the usb UEFI when I create the us
not UEFI.
>
>
>
> *From:* wl...@bsdimp.com [mailto:wl...@bsdimp.com] *On Behalf Of *Warner
> Losh
> *Sent:* Monday, 4 September 2017 10:44 AM
> *To:* Priyadarshana Chandrasena
> *Cc:* Maciej Suszko; FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List
>
> *Subject:* Re: HP Smart array P440 support
>
It is saying that missing bootable media and what is found is not UEFI.
From: wl...@bsdimp.com [mailto:wl...@bsdimp.com] On Behalf Of Warner Losh
Sent: Monday, 4 September 2017 10:44 AM
To: Priyadarshana Chandrasena
Cc: Maciej Suszko; FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List
Subject: Re: HP Smart array
om: Maciej Suszko [mailto:mac...@suszko.eu]
> Sent: Monday, 4 September 2017 4:49 AM
> To: Priyadarshana Chandrasena
> Cc: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.org
> Subject: Re: HP Smart array P440 support
>
> "Priyadarshana Chandrasena" wrote:
> > I have HP DL20 Gen 9 server
...@suszko.eu]
Sent: Monday, 4 September 2017 4:49 AM
To: Priyadarshana Chandrasena
Cc: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HP Smart array P440 support
"Priyadarshana Chandrasena" wrote:
> I have HP DL20 Gen 9 server. But I can not install FreeBSD 10.2 in it.
> I have a HP sma
"Priyadarshana Chandrasena" wrote:
> I have HP DL20 Gen 9 server. But I can not install FreeBSD 10.2 in
> it. I have a HP smart array P440 in my server. I can not find out
> anywhere if ciss driver support include HP Gen 9 storage
> controllers. Could you please update t
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Rainer Duffner
wrote:
>
> > Am 03.09.2017 um 15:04 schrieb Priyadarshana Chandrasena <
> v...@ulka.com.au>:
> >
> > In UEFI mode the boot process does not read the installation media usb.
> > Never booted from the usb in UEFI mode!
>
>
> Hm. Interesting.
> Can you
> Am 03.09.2017 um 15:04 schrieb Priyadarshana Chandrasena :
>
> In UEFI mode the boot process does not read the installation media usb.
> Never booted from the usb in UEFI mode!
Hm. Interesting.
Can you try 11.1 then?
I think I had that problem around the 9.x days, with G7 hardware.
Or I thin
; FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HP Smart array P440 support
> Am 03.09.2017 um 14:53 schrieb Priyadarshana Chandrasena
:
>
> I have tried to install FreeBSD 10.3 in a HP DL20 Gen 9 server with
> P440 smart array. My installation media is in a USB drive.
>
> In BIOS I
> Am 03.09.2017 um 14:53 schrieb Priyadarshana Chandrasena :
>
> I have tried to install FreeBSD 10.3 in a HP DL20 Gen 9 server with P440
> smart array. My installation media is in a USB drive.
>
> In BIOS I set the Boot mode to Legacy boot mode.
Why?
It should work in
I have tried to install FreeBSD 10.3 in a HP DL20 Gen 9 server with P440
smart array. My installation media is in a USB drive.
In BIOS I set the Boot mode to Legacy boot mode.
Created my P440 array and a logical drive with RAID 1.
Disabled B140i controller.
The installation process went on and
Subject: Re: HP Smart array P440 support
All
Also don't forget to is install cciss_vol_status to monitor the array .
---
Mark Saad | nones...@longcount.org
On Sep 2, 2017, at 11:41 AM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>>> I have HP DL20 Gen 9 server. But I can not install FreeBSD 10.2 in
All
Also don't forget to is install cciss_vol_status to monitor the array .
---
Mark Saad | nones...@longcount.org
On Sep 2, 2017, at 11:41 AM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>>> I have HP DL20 Gen 9 server. But I can not install FreeBSD 10.2 in it. I
>>> have a HP smart arr
> > I have HP DL20 Gen 9 server. But I can not install FreeBSD 10.2 in it. I
> > have a HP smart array P440 in my server. I can not find out anywhere if ciss
> > driver support include HP Gen 9 storage controllers. Could you please
> > update the ciss driver in 10.3?
>
> Am 02.09.2017 um 15:48 schrieb Priyadarshana Chandrasena :
>
> I have HP DL20 Gen 9 server. But I can not install FreeBSD 10.2 in it. I
> have a HP smart array P440 in my server. I can not find out anywhere if ciss
> driver support include HP Gen 9 storage controllers. C
I have HP DL20 Gen 9 server. But I can not install FreeBSD 10.2 in it. I
have a HP smart array P440 in my server. I can not find out anywhere if ciss
driver support include HP Gen 9 storage controllers. Could you please
update the ciss driver in 10.3?
Regrads,
P Chandrasena
> Serguey
I believe it's supported with geom_raid . I had a similar b1xx card in a hp
dl165 and using graid was the only solution to setup raid 1 or 1+0. it's a
hardware accelerated software raid , not a true smart array controller.
---
On Oct 26, 2012, at 5:51 AM, S.N.Gri
Hi list,
who can say does FreeBSD 8.x/9.x support HP Smart Array B120i controller?
Thanks,
Serguey.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-s
2010/1/26 Jeremy Chadwick :
> As mentioned a while back on the list[1], I worked on getting atacontrol
> to spit out SMART statistics for ATA disks. Specifically, this would be
> those using the standard ata(4) layer (including ataahci.ko and
> similar), but not ahci(4) (ahci.ko), wh
y.
>
> Some time ago i've began the same work, but did not finish it because
> ENOTIME..
> So, did you look to NetBSD's implementation? As i remember NetBSD has SMART
> reporting and testing support in atactl.
Nope, I had no idea they had existing code already in their user
ou look to NetBSD's implementation? As i remember NetBSD has SMART
reporting and testing support in atactl.
--
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
As mentioned a while back on the list[1], I worked on getting atacontrol
to spit out SMART statistics for ATA disks. Specifically, this would be
those using the standard ata(4) layer (including ataahci.ko and
similar), but not ahci(4) (ahci.ko), which uses ATA/CAM.
Output resembles the following
> >tell you...) and ata(4) bits (since the ioctls aren't documented).
> >
> >[2]: Yes, I'm still working on writing that doc that explains how to
> >read SMART data. Going to have to end up doing it for work as well...
> >oh the joys. :-)
>
> Yes ple
myself given that I was able to figure out
how to
accomplish it by looking at some smartmontools source (messy, let me
tell you...) and ata(4) bits (since the ioctls aren't documented).
[2]: Yes, I'm still working on writing that doc that explains how to
read SMART data. Going to ha
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:44:28AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:25:12PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >
> > >I can teach you how to decode/read SMART statistics correctly.
> >
> > Actually, it would
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:25:12PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> >I can teach you how to decode/read SMART statistics correctly.
> >
>
> Actually, it would be good if you taught more than him :)
>
> I've always wondered how im
te the statistics you quoted are "Vendor Specific SMART Attributes",
> > so it is quite logical for different vendors to have different
> > statistics. :)
>
> I see your point :)
>
> Though I would hope that a statistics like:
>
> 1 Raw_Read_Error_R
Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2009-11-12 14:35, Ivan Voras wrote:
I've seen it. But I don't remember if they addressed the problem of
nonstandard interpretations of statistics?
Note the statistics you quoted are "Vendor Specific SMART Attributes",
so it is quite logical for
On 2009-11-12 14:35, Ivan Voras wrote:
> I've seen it. But I don't remember if they addressed the problem of
> nonstandard interpretations of statistics?
Note the statistics you quoted are "Vendor Specific SMART Attributes",
so it is quite logical for different
Bruce Cran wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:56:16 +0100
Ivan Voras wrote:
Yes, it's Seagate. Statistically I have the least problems with their
drives. But I imagine that lack of standardization about these
statistics very much limits the usability of SMART, right?
The main problem with
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:56:16 +0100
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Yes, it's Seagate. Statistically I have the least problems with their
> drives. But I imagine that lack of standardization about these
> statistics very much limits the usability of SMART, right?
>
The main problem with
Thomas Backman wrote:
On Nov 12, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
Actually, it would be good if you taught more than him :)
I've always wondered how important are each of the dozen or so statistics and
what indicates what...
Here is for example my desktop drive:
SMART Attributes
On Nov 12, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Actually, it would be good if you taught more than him :)
>
> I've always wondered how important are each of the dozen or so statistics and
> what indicates what...
>
> Here is for example my desktop drive:
>
> SM
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I can teach you how to decode/read SMART statistics correctly.
Actually, it would be good if you taught more than him :)
I've always wondered how important are each of the dozen or so
statistics and what indicates what...
Here is for example my desktop
Hi,
I have a mpt raid and want to run smart on the individual drives. But
the
examples in the config all seems linux-specific. Is there a way to get
SMART-status for the drives in a mpt-raid?
--
Peter Ankerstål
pe...@pean.org
http://www.pean.org
pression the conclusion was reached like this:
>>> "man smartd.conf ... oh, -s, a neat thing, let's enable it".
>>>
>>> There are negative repercussions to doing tests of this nature at such
>>> regular intervals. Once-a-week is borderline accept
sed disk -- and most do not see any effect -- but under high
> I/O I would assume there is a chance the suspend/resume aspect of SMART
> tests could take longer than 5 seconds. Though I am disappointed in
> the fact that people often schedule "maintenance things" all at the same
&
IMO, A much better option to run on a weekly basis is to use a RAID
controller with "verify" feature (eg. 3ware) or use ZFS "scrub" mode.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubsc
/7/03) -m root # ++
> > >>>>2006-11-03 mato
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I believe I came up with the settings after reading manual page /
> > >>>>documentation of the tool.
> > >>>
> > >>>Can you expl
7/03) -m root # ++
> >>>>2006-11-03 mato
> >>>>
> >>>>I believe I came up with the settings after reading manual page /
> >>>>documentation of the tool.
> >>>
> >>>Can you explain why you're doing this? So
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:53 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 06:22:03PM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
> > Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > Do you understand what short and long offline tests actually do and what
> > > they're used for? :-) If so, you'd know that running them pe
to know what kind of affect daily
tests have on MTBF; I can imagine it's reached much sooner with this.
The main point of smartd is to monitor SMART attribute changes. If
you're concerned about the health of your hard disk, you should be
looking at your logs and not relying on things li
vided a
>> reason *why* they're doing short and long offline scans on a daily
>> basis. I'm under the impression the conclusion was reached like this:
>> "man smartd.conf ... oh, -s, a neat thing, let's enable it".
>>
>> There are negative reperc
7;s reached much sooner with this.
The main point of smartd is to monitor SMART attribute changes. If
you're concerned about the health of your hard disk, you should be
looking at your logs and not relying on things like automatic short/long
tests. Most SMART attributes are updated immed
g, let's enable it".
There are negative repercussions to doing tests of this nature at such
regular intervals. Once-a-week is borderline acceptable; once a month
would be quite reasonable. I'd love to know what kind of affect daily
tests have on MTBF; I can imagine it's reached much soo
ily"), and many of those are I/O bound.
This could possibly extend the length of the short test until 0454.
Weekly periodic jobs run at 0415 in the morning, on Sundays. These also
perform a lot of disk I/O, so it's possible that on Sunday specifically
the short SMART test gets pushed
s of this nature at such
regular intervals. Once-a-week is borderline acceptable; once a month
would be quite reasonable. I'd love to know what kind of affect daily
tests have on MTBF; I can imagine it's reached much sooner with this.
The main point of smartd is to monitor SMART attribu
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything besides
disabling the testing that I can do about it?
Do you understand what short and long offline tests actually do and what
they're used for? :-) If so, you'd know that running them periodically
is more
run starting at
> > 0301 in the morning ("periodic daily"), and many of those are I/O bound.
> > This could possibly extend the length of the short test until 0454.
> >
> > Weekly periodic jobs run at 0415 in the morning, on Sundays. These also
> > perfo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hi,
>> I have recently bought a new disk (Seagate 500G, ST35
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
> I have recently bought a new disk (Seagate 500G, ST3500320NS). I have
> enabled SMART checking using the smartmontools as usual for the disk
> (/d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have recently bought a new disk (Seagate 500G, ST3500320NS). I have
enabled SMART checking using the smartmontools as usual for the disk
(/dev/ad6 -a -S on -s (S/../.././03|L/../../7/03) -m root). The problem
is that each time the test runs I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
System : HP DL385G1 Smart Array 6i AMD64 FBSD 6.3
I want to migrate my RAID1 (2 disks) (automatically assigned as RAID1
bacause I have two disks inserted in RAID 1+0 logical drive), add two
more disks and get actual RAID 1+0 drive of four
Hi,
HP DL365 (dual amd opteron), Smart Array P800 connected to MSA60 with 9
750GB SATA drives configured as one logical RAID5 volume. FreeBSD
6-STABLE csupped yesterday. Kernel is GENERIC.
System failed to create device entry for this volume.
Here's the relevant output of dmesg when boot
[mhd_reg_logo.gif]
Dear Bank of America member,
In order to be prepared for the smart card upgrade on Visa and
MasterCard debit and credit cards and to avoid problems with our ATM
services, we have recently introduced additional security measures and
[mhd_reg_logo.gif]
Dear Bank of America member,
In order to be prepared for the smart card upgrade on Visa and
MasterCard debit and credit cards and to avoid problems with our ATM
services, we have recently introduced additional security measures and
Card reader won't recognize any CF card and smart card inserted- same reader
works just fine under XP (it automatically downloaded drivers from MS- I say
this because I am sure this device is in working condition)- don't know who
is manufacturer. Any other USB2 and USB1 flash card
Either at the 4.x or 6.x versions ... ? I'm looking at an HP 1U server
that has this included ... will this be a problem?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:09:01AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 21 Jan, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:31:06AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> >> For servers that lack solid backup power (not a 10 minute
> >> UPS), I would probably turn it off. But for most systems it is proba
On 21 Jan, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:31:06AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> For servers that lack solid backup power (not a 10 minute
>> UPS), I would probably turn it off. But for most systems it is probably
>> worth the risks.
>
> A 10 minute UPS should be plenty for tha
On Fri, 2005-Jan-21 09:28:37 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>10 minutes (or even 1 minute) would be fine IF you have the system
>shutdown when the main power fails, but if the system is unattended and
>active and power goes out, it will simply keep going until the UPS dies
>and will still leave your d
> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:49:29 +0100
> From: Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:31:06AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > > Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:53:12 +1300
> > > From: Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > Jim C. Nasby w
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:31:06AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:53:12 +1300
> > From: Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > > Question one: how do I disable write caching on IDE drives? I know the
> > > setting
> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:53:12 +1300
> From: Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > Question one: how do I disable write caching on IDE drives? I know the
> > setting is hw.ata.wc=0, but where do I put that? In loader.conf? This is
> > FreeBSD
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Question one: how do I disable write caching on IDE drives? I know the
setting is hw.ata.wc=0, but where do I put that? In loader.conf? This is
FreeBSD 4.10, btw.
In /boot/loader.conf will do it.
Also, has any thought been given to making the default 0, like it is for
SCSI devic
t for SMART in FreeBSD?
RELENG_5 with /usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools/ works really well. But
you need to move to RELENG_5.
---Mike
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stab
that the default
is speed over data integrity.
Question two: is there any support for SMART in FreeBSD? I see that
atacontrol cap displays the status (supported and disabled), but I don't
know of any way to turn it on. Likewise, what about the other options
shown by atacontrol cap?
--
Ji
tput from dmesg:
pci2: (vendor=0x0e11, dev=0x0046) at 1.0 irq 5
According to pciids.sourceforge.net, 0e11 is Compaq, and
0046 is their ID for the Smart Array 64xx. It is not in
the list of supported IDS in src/sys/dev/ciss/ciss.c.
Would it work to just add that ID to the list, compile a
kernel, an
On Wednesday 22 September 2004 04.51, Carroll Kong wrote:
> twe0: <3ware Storage Controller driver ver. 1.40.01.002> port 0xc800-0xc80f
> mem 0xfe00-0xfe7f,0xfeaffc00-0xfeaffc0f irq 2 at
> device 7.0 on pci1
> twe0: 4 ports, Firmware FE7X 1.05.00.068, BIOS BE7X 1.08.00.048
twe0: <3ware St
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: 3ware 7506, FreeBSD 4.x, Maxtor Disks & SMART Problems.
> One of the maxtor disks at the colocation with the 3ware card was failing
to
> complete it's long tests with read errors. This is inline with Jason's
with
additional resistors).
- Carroll Kong
- Original Message -
From: "Anton Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Carroll Kong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jason Thomson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 1
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Ken Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 06:35:27PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
There was a nasty bug just about as 4.10 went out the door with the twe
driver. I thought the fix went into the release, though. If you get a
chance you might try moving up t
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 06:35:27PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
>
> > There was a nasty bug just about as 4.10 went out the door with the twe
> > driver. I thought the fix went into the release, though. If you get a
> > chance you might try moving up to the -sta
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 06:35:27PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
> There was a nasty bug just about as 4.10 went out the door with the twe
> driver. I thought the fix went into the release, though. If you get a
> chance you might try moving up to the -stable version of src/sys/dev/twe
> and see if tha
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Jason Thomson wrote:
>
> > We have a number of FreeBSD boxes with 7506 series 3ware controllers
> > (about 10 and about to buy 10 more). We are generally happy with the
> > performance and reliability, but we have a few intermit
> this is what we find.
> >
> > { 0x0e11, 0x4070, CISS_BOARD_SA5, "Compaq Smart Array 5300" },
> > { 0x0e11, 0x4080, CISS_BOARD_SA5B, "Compaq Smart Array 5i" },
> > { 0x0e11, 0x4082, CISS_BOARD_SA5B, "Compaq Smart Array 532" },
&
cc:
owner-freebsd-stable@FSubject: Compaq Smart Array 431
support
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
write:
>I've got 30 of those boxes. I was able to install 4.1-RELEASE
>from a bootable CD. 4.1-STABLE doesn't like 4GB of RAM in them though.
>And I'm only using the single processor version.
4.1 should have no problems handling the 4G of memory in the boxes.
In article
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
you write:
>hi there,
>we recently received a test machine from Compaq, whose only two
>harddisks live behind a Compaq Smart RAID Array. A Collegue of mine if
>currently trying to install Linux on that machine, whilst i'm up to trying
>t
D]>
> To: "Barak Enat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 10:45 PM
> Subject: Re: sysinstall and compaq smart raid disks (idad)
>
> > I've got Compaq DL360s with the Integrated Smart
> > RAID adap
86 matches
Mail list logo
