Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-12 Thread Chris
Ok thanks I will stick to the old scheduler on my smp system then. Chris On 5/12/05, Steven Jurczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris wrote: > > >Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4 > >onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning > >on up

Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Steven Jurczyk
Chris wrote: Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4 onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month. Have you guys tried this without SMP? Yes. pthreads applications under SCHED_ULE but without SM

Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:28:14AM +0100, Chris wrote: > Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4 > onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning > on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month. > > Have you guys tried this without SMP? Guys..

Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 05/11/05 18:28, Chris wrote: On 5/11/05, Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mi, 11.05.2005, 14:34, Steven Jurczyk sagte: **Using SCHED_ULE on SMP/HT machine broke applications which use libpthread/libthr, probably at context switching between threads... The applications simply hang and

Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Chris
Seems the 4+ cpu crash fix might have broken it at a guess since RC4 onwards it broke, I am interested in how this goes as I was planning on upgrading a SMP box to 5.4 and ULE this month. Have you guys tried this without SMP? Chris On 5/11/05, Marian Hettwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mi, 1

Re: SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Marian Hettwer
On Mi, 11.05.2005, 14:34, Steven Jurczyk sagte: > **Using SCHED_ULE on SMP/HT machine broke applications which use > libpthread/libthr, probably at context switching between threads... The > applications simply hang and they aren't killable (kill -9 don't > work).. Usually this also break kernel s

SCHED_ULE with SMP broke libpthread/libthr on 5.4-RELEASE

2005-05-11 Thread Steven Jurczyk
**Using SCHED_ULE on SMP/HT machine broke applications which use libpthread/libthr, probably at context switching between threads... The applications simply hang and they aren't killable (kill -9 don't work).. Usually this also break kernel shutdown (can't flush some inodes or blocks)... This