Brad Knowles wrote:
>
> In -CURRENT, I would say that this could probably be committed,
> if John feels safe. I am not yet convinced that it should be
> committed to -STABLE, although things do look good so far.
Just to clarify, I committed it to -current already this morning.
John
T
At 3:00 PM -0800 1999/12/9, Julian Elischer wrote:
> so can it be committed?
In -CURRENT, I would say that this could probably be committed,
if John feels safe. I am not yet convinced that it should be
committed to -STABLE, although things do look good so far.
--
These are my op
At 8:56 PM +0100 1999/12/9, Brad Knowles wrote:
> So far, it looks like it might have fixed the problem. At least,
> the "InUse" count goes down when a route goes away:
Things continue to look good:
Thu Dec 9 20:59:15 CET 1999
netstat -ran | wc -l
122
vmstat -m | grep rout
so can it be committed?
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Joe Greco wrote:
> The patch previously mentioned has completely fixed my problem, as far as I
> can tell.
>
> routetbl 13117K 25K 40960K936240 0 16,32,64,128,256
>
> after a day of uptime.
>
> > here's mine..
> > this is
The patch previously mentioned has completely fixed my problem, as far as I
can tell.
routetbl 13117K 25K 40960K936240 0 16,32,64,128,256
after a day of uptime.
> here's mine..
> this is from a single homed machine, with a default route. it's also a IRC
> server (irc.
At 10:29 AM -0800 1999/12/9, John Polstra wrote:
> Thanks for helping me test it!
So far, it looks like it might have fixed the problem. At least,
the "InUse" count goes down when a route goes away:
Thu Dec 9 20:14:03 CET 1999
netstat -ran | wc -l
123
vmstat -m | grep routetbl
> > Have any of you been seeing route table leaks in -current? I noticed
> > this week that cvsup-master.freebsd.org is suffering from them. I
> > actually had to reboot it because it couldn't allocate any more. From
> > the "vmstat -m" out
> At 08:51 AM 12/8/99 -0600, Joe Greco wrote:
> >Most of which are routes pointing at the 3 private-net interfaces on the
> >machine.
>
> The info was provided more as a comparison, that quantity of routes do not
> necessary mean leak ? Or perhaps it does. But after 90 days, you would
> think t
At 08:51 AM 12/8/99 -0600, Joe Greco wrote:
>Most of which are routes pointing at the 3 private-net interfaces on the
>machine.
The info was provided more as a comparison, that quantity of routes do not
necessary mean leak ? Or perhaps it does. But after 90 days, you would
think the problem wo
> >Hell, I've been seeing this for well over a year. The last time I mentioned
> >it, everybody seemed to think I was nuts. :-)
> >
> >FreeBSD 3.0-19981015-BETA #1: Tue Jan 12 03:30:56 CST 1999
> >
> > routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 4357410 0
> 16,32,64,128,256
>
> Well, I h
10 matches
Mail list logo
