Re: Reverse delegation of CIDR addresses (was: sdflkj)

2001-10-04 Thread Patrick M. Hausen
Hi all! Though this is way off topic, I feel urged to add in my 2 cents. Any suggestions, where to take this discussion? firewall-wizards? ;-) Jan Mikelsen wrote: > While the example from the original URL is wrong, as is pointed out in this > quote, that doesn't mean that you must use CNAMEs to

Re: Reverse delegation of CIDR addresses (was: sdflkj)

2001-10-04 Thread Jan Mikkelsen
"Ingeborg Hellemo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > On Thu 2001-10-04 (08:59), Ceri wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 05:16:20PM -0700, Michael Sierchio said: > > > > > > > My apologies. My ISP's absolute refusal to delegate reverse entries > > > > for my domain and /29