On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:37 PM, H wrote:
> If you are curious about something, ask, right away ... clear and straight
I'm curious about when you will stop trolling one of the last few fora
on the internet where the SNR is actually high. This topic is
discussing how users can help Kip can make flo
Adam Strohl wrote:
> On 3/5/2012 15:00, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>> I happen to share the opinion and the experience of Mark Linimon in
>> situations like this and yes, I do believe you have been rude here.
>> For no reason whatsoever.
>
> I agree. This "H" person has been hijacking threads over the
Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> On Mar 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, H wrote:
>
>> I have the right, even the obligation to point out what I think is wrong
> So, you see yourself as speaking for others? You certainly do not speak for
> me! Never authorized you for this, never ever knew you actually exist. For
> v
On 3/5/2012 15:00, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
I happen to share the opinion and the experience of Mark Linimon in situations
like this and yes, I do believe you have been rude here. For no reason
whatsoever.
I agree. This "H" person has been hijacking threads over the last week
or so, and all of
On Mar 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, H wrote:
> I have the right, even the obligation to point out what I think is wrong
So, you see yourself as speaking for others? You certainly do not speak for me!
Never authorized you for this, never ever knew you actually exist. For various
historical reasons, I d
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 02:28:37AM -0300, H wrote:
>> because you don't care about what really matters, people, users, you
>> do not even know how to talk to them
> I've been criticized for saying this to a user before, but I'm going to
> repeat it here regardless of consequen
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 02:28:37AM -0300, H wrote:
> because you don't care about what really matters, people, users, you
> do not even know how to talk to them
I've been criticized for saying this to a user before, but I'm going to
repeat it here regardless of consequences.
I'm sorry, you (as a
K. Macy wrote:
> I'm re-sending this portion of another mail as it will inevitably not
> be read by most readers by virtue of having been part of a long and
> digressive thread.
>
this is exactly one of this statements which makes users (normal people)
stay away
a person-person understand this as
I'm re-sending this portion of another mail as it will inevitably not
be read by most readers by virtue of having been part of a long and
digressive thread.
subject line: "flowtable usable or not"
It is possible to re-structure the routing code to have a smaller
cache footprint / shorter lookup t
