Re: Reliably trigger-able ZFS panic

2008-03-03 Thread Quake Lee
Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:27:35 +0800,Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: The kernel is FreeBSD fs12.sina.com.cn 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun Mar 2 18:50:05 CST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ZFORK amd64 the get all at below: fs12# zfs get all NAME PROPERTY VALUE

Re: Reliably trigger-able ZFS panic

2008-03-03 Thread Xin LI
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 03:49:03AM -0800, LI Xin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The following iozone test case on ZFS would reliably trigger panic: >> >> /usr/local/bin/iozone -M -e -+u -T -t 128 -S 4096 -L 64 -R -r 4k -s 30g >> -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -i 8 -+p 70 -C > > Thanks, I'll try

Re: Reliably trigger-able ZFS panic

2008-03-03 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 03:49:03AM -0800, LI Xin wrote: > Hi, > > The following iozone test case on ZFS would reliably trigger panic: > > /usr/local/bin/iozone -M -e -+u -T -t 128 -S 4096 -L 64 -R -r 4k -s 30g > -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -i 8 -+p 70 -C Thanks, I'll try to reproduce it. [...] > #19 0x000

Re: Reliably trigger-able ZFS panic

2008-03-03 Thread Ivan Voras
LI Xin wrote: > Hi, > > The following iozone test case on ZFS would reliably trigger panic: > > /usr/local/bin/iozone -M -e -+u -T -t 128 -S 4096 -L 64 -R -r 4k -s 30g > -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -i 8 -+p 70 -C It can also be (eventually) triggered by "blogbench -c 100 -i 30 -r 50 -w 10 -W 10" and heavy IO

Reliably trigger-able ZFS panic

2008-03-02 Thread LI Xin
Hi, The following iozone test case on ZFS would reliably trigger panic: /usr/local/bin/iozone -M -e -+u -T -t 128 -S 4096 -L 64 -R -r 4k -s 30g -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -i 8 -+p 70 -C Unfortunately the kgdb can not reveal useful backtrace. I have tried KDB_TRACE, but have not yet be able to further i