On July 24, 2001 09:08 am, you wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:53:02AM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Jason Andresen wrote:
> > > A sysinstall prompt would be nice though. An even nicer option
> > > would be a little menu on the diskLabel part of the install that
> > > as
Hi,
You can't search, but you can browse...
Regards
-T.W.Chan-
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Gregory Bond wrote:
> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 09:12:18 +1000
> From: Gregory Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> What ridiculous, unsubstantiated flame-bait.
Call it lack of coffee and a bad hangover.
After reading your post, the issue becomes clearer. To be honest, I
immediately assumed an argumentative stance because the (most
recent) thread was started with
From: Mike Hoskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Regarding hw.ata.wc="1"..
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 08:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
> Unfortuneately then, the reason I chose FreeBSD (server-tuned OS) so
> many years ago is no longer valid. Of course, I knew this w
On Tue 2001-07-24 (12:14), Mixtim wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 08:12:58AM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote:
> > Hmm. I hope the response to recent performance tests was /not/ to make a
> > potentially unsafe option 'default'.
>
> Its only unsafe if you lose power. I think that anyone running a
> "s
- Jordan
From: Mike Hoskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Regarding hw.ata.wc="1"..
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 08:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> > to take. Yes, writes will be faster with write caching enabled. However,
> &
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Shawn Workman wrote:
> > Its only unsafe if you lose power. I think that anyone running a
> > "server" without a UPS deserves to lose data.
First, there's an infinite number of variables that can lead to power
loss. Think about it.
> Especially the ones without recent back
