On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:54:54AM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> >>>I'd say that your patch works.
> >>
> >>John, are you okay with that patch?
> >>http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/fha_extract_info_realign2.diff
> >>
> >>It's intention is to:
> >>-
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:46:57AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday 31 January 2010 11:28:54 am Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:06:18PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > > Sorry for the delay, I was trying to avoid rebooting my server.
> > > I've setup a similar environment i
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
I'd say that your patch works.
John, are you okay with that patch?
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/fha_extract_info_realign2.diff
It's intention is to:
- Move nfs_realign() from the NFS client to the shared NFS code and
remove the NFS server versi
On Sunday 31 January 2010 11:28:54 am Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:06:18PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > Sorry for the delay, I was trying to avoid rebooting my server.
> > I've setup a similar environment in VirtualBox to test it.
> >
> > On 2010-Jan-27 12:52:29 +0100, Mariu
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:06:18PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Sorry for the delay, I was trying to avoid rebooting my server.
> I've setup a similar environment in VirtualBox to test it.
>
> On 2010-Jan-27 12:52:29 +0100, Marius Strobl
> wrote:
> >Ah, I forgot that using nfsm_aligned() causes
Sorry for the delay, I was trying to avoid rebooting my server.
I've setup a similar environment in VirtualBox to test it.
On 2010-Jan-27 12:52:29 +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
>Ah, I forgot that using nfsm_aligned() causes nfs_realign() to
>be a NOP on architectures without strict alignment requir
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:52:29PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:36:49PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > On 2010-Jan-26 15:10:59 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > >On Tuesday 26 January 2010 1:37:56 pm Marius Strobl wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:46:44AM -0500, Joh
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:36:49PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2010-Jan-26 15:10:59 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> >On Tuesday 26 January 2010 1:37:56 pm Marius Strobl wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:46:44AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 26 January 2010 2:33:37 am Peter Jer
On 2010-Jan-26 15:10:59 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>On Tuesday 26 January 2010 1:37:56 pm Marius Strobl wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:46:44AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 26 January 2010 2:33:37 am Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> > > I have just upgraded to 8-STABLE/amd64 from about 18
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 1:37:56 pm Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:46:44AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 January 2010 2:33:37 am Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > > I have just upgraded to 8-STABLE/amd64 from about 18 hours ago and am
> > > now getting regular (the followi
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:46:44AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 January 2010 2:33:37 am Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > I have just upgraded to 8-STABLE/amd64 from about 18 hours ago and am
> > now getting regular (the following pair of messages about every
> > minute) compaints as follows:
>
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 2:33:37 am Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I have just upgraded to 8-STABLE/amd64 from about 18 hours ago and am
> now getting regular (the following pair of messages about every
> minute) compaints as follows:
>
> kernel: uma_zalloc_arg: zone "mbuf" with the following non-sleepab
12 matches
Mail list logo
