> "JKH" == Jordan K Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Let's take removing Samba as an example:
>>
>> 1. pkg_info | grep -i samba
>> 2. wait for a long time.
>> 3. pkg_delete samba-2.0.6
Why not pkg_delete samba ?
JKH> What I don't understand is why the next generation of pack
- Original Message -
From: "Cy Schubert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Patrick Seal writes:
| > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 01:44:57PM -0700i, Chad R. Larson wrote:
| > > I think they're pointing out the difference between "pkg_delete", a
| > > binary part of the syst
in any case I propose:
pkg_info | grep -i package_to_remove | xargs pkg_delete
cheers,
Pedro
On 12-May-2000 Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Patrick Seal writes:
>> On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 01:44:57PM -0700i, Chad R. Larson wrote:
>> > I think they're point
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Patrick Seal writes:
> On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 01:44:57PM -0700i, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> > I think they're pointing out the difference between "pkg_delete", a
> > binary part of the system, and "pkg_remove", a perl script in ports.
>
> Whoops! Anyway, looking at t
On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 01:44:57PM -0700i, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> I think they're pointing out the difference between "pkg_delete", a
> binary part of the system, and "pkg_remove", a perl script in ports.
Whoops! Anyway, looking at the source code, what's so great about it? Why
should anyone use
As I recall, Patrick Seal wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:11:05PM -0700i, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group
>wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sheldon Hearn writes:
> >
> > The pkg_remove port is quite handy. It's a utility I'd like to see in
> > the base system.
>
> Thats w
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:11:05PM -0700i, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sheldon Hearn writes:
>
> The pkg_remove port is quite handy. It's a utility I'd like to see in
> the base system.
Thats why it is. Where did you think it came from?
/usr/
