On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)
wrote:
>
>> On Aug 29, 2016, at 06:00, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>>
>> I notice that there are some consistent test failures on 10-STABLE:
>>
>> https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_stable_10/362/testReport/
>>
>> sys.geom.class.gate.2
> On Aug 29, 2016, at 06:00, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
> I notice that there are some consistent test failures on 10-STABLE:
>
> https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_stable_10/362/testReport/
>
> sys.geom.class.gate.2
> lib.libc.string.memcpy_test.memcpy_basic
>
> have been failing for abou
Quoth Jason Hellenthal on Sunday, 08 May 2011:
> hackers,
>
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:54:18PM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >
> > hackers,
> >
> > Test
> >
>
> My appologies. this message was never supposed to leave the outbox.
> Instead of hitting one key I hit another. Please disregar
hackers,
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 01:54:18PM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> hackers,
>
> Test
>
My appologies. this message was never supposed to leave the outbox.
Instead of hitting one key I hit another. Please disregard.
Thanks.
--
Regards, (jhell)
Jason Hellenthal
2008/12/17 :
> This is a test message from Cogeco Cable. No reply is necessary.
What's wrong with http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-test ?
--
R< $&h ! > $- ! $+ $@ $2 < @ $1 .UUCP. > (sendmail.cf)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ma
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 12:33 PM 11/2/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
So at this point I'm unclear, with my reposting of if_em.c last
night has everyone seen both parts or do I have to try something
else?
I never saw a .c file
so put them in ~/public_html on freefall
and they can be accessed as:
http
At 12:33 PM 11/2/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
So at this point I'm unclear, with my reposting of if_em.c last
night has everyone seen both parts or do I have to try something
else?
Seems to work. I grabbed it from the mailing list archive off www.freebsd.org
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/free
So at this point I'm unclear, with my reposting of if_em.c last
night has everyone seen both parts or do I have to try something
else?
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscrib
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 12:10:59AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Although I see it at least one person claims the message
> came thru with only the header file, so I am going
> to send if_em.c thru again.
>
Attachments are usually stripped off by the mailing list software, so
you are probably better
Although I see it at least one person claims the message
came thru with only the header file, so I am going
to send if_em.c thru again.
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscri
Jack Vogel wrote:
Although I see it at least one person claims the message
came thru with only the header file, so I am going
to send if_em.c thru again.
Jack
___
[EMAIL PROT
Eh, what I see is if_em.h and if_em.c, does the version
that came thru not have both??
Jack
On 11/1/07, Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You just replace the two files in your STABLE tree. Its big
> > enough that this seemed easier than a patch.
>
> Did you miss a file ? I nly see a ne
> Eh, what I see is if_em.h and if_em.c, does the version
> that came thru not have both??
Nope, it's only got if_em.h in it - I just took a look at
the actual mime stuff in the email and tere is only one
attachment in the version I received.
-pete.
___
> You just replace the two files in your STABLE tree. Its big
> enough that this seemed easier than a patch.
Did you miss a file ? I nly see a new header file in here. Am keen to
try this out though...
-pcf.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
h
Johnnie wrote:
test
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
test passed
___
freebsd-stable
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:41:35 +0200, podenok wrote
> test
Please send these kind of e-mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] There you can do all
the testing you want :)
Jorn
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
The list of untested nodes has been narrowed down
to the following three:
ng_bridge, ng_l2tp, ng_lmi
Please, if you use one of these three test this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/totest/netgraph_callout
T> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:10:48PM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T> T> D
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
The patch at
http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/totest/netgraph_callout
has been updated. Now it covers the following nodes:
ng_bridge.c
ng_l2tp.c
ng_lmi.c
ng_pppoe.c
ng_pptpgre.c
One more time I ask for testing. The patch can
The patch at
http://people.freebsd.org/~glebius/totest/netgraph_callout
has been updated. Now it covers the following nodes:
ng_bridge.c
ng_l2tp.c
ng_lmi.c
ng_pppoe.c
ng_pptpgre.c
One more time I ask for testing. The patch can be applied both t
http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/tty.patch
This patch removes 2500 lines of copy&paste insanity in tty drivers
and generally tries to get things to be less confused & confusing.
I need testers for all the different kinds of serial hardware we support.
Please help test!
--
Poul-Henning Kamp |
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:24:27PM +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:30:25 +0100
> Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> JK> Dear USB users,
> JK>
> JK> We have made a patch available of the USB stack in -current, back
> JK> ported to -stable. I am looking for f
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:30:25 +0100
Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JK> Dear USB users,
JK>
JK> We have made a patch available of the USB stack in -current, back
JK> ported to -stable. I am looking for feedback from USB users as to
JK> whether it works or not so that we can consider i
22 matches
Mail list logo
