Am Samstag, 22. Januar 2005 15:52 schrieb Shunsuke Akiyama:
[...]
> Good work!
>
> I've updated your patch. If attached patch works correctly with new
> revision chip, I'll commit this. Please test attached patch, and tell
> me the result.
I tested it (after removing the DOS ^M characters) again
At Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:18:30 +0100,
Michal Mertl wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> > Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 16:17 schrieb Andrew L. Neporada:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > > > > Dear experts,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have two USB-RS2
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005 14:18 schrieb Michal Mertl:
>
> > I tested my patch for binary safety on CURRENT yesterday (dialed with
> > ppp) and didn't notice any problem.
> >
> > I'm attaching my patch again because some recipients didn't probably
> > receive it yester
Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005 14:18 schrieb Michal Mertl:
> I tested my patch for binary safety on CURRENT yesterday (dialed with
> ppp) and didn't notice any problem.
>
> I'm attaching my patch again because some recipients didn't probably
> receive it yesterday.
This didn't apply cleanly again
Am Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2005 14:18 schrieb Michal Mertl:
> > works for both chips on CURRENT for serial console. It detects if the
> > chip is rev 3.00 and aplies the patch only for it.
> >
> > The author of the patch mentions it isn't binary safe - sometimes the
> > chip stops working. I planne
I wrote:
> Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 16:17 schrieb Andrew L. Neporada:
> > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > > > Dear experts,
> > > >
> > > > I have two USB-RS232 Adaptors, both with PL2303 chipset. One is working
> > > > the other o
Sorry to reply to myself but I would better really attach the patch.
I wrote:
> Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 16:17 schrieb Andrew L. Neporada:
> > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > > > Dear experts,
> > > >
> > > > I have two USB-RS232
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 16:17 schrieb Andrew L. Neporada:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > > Dear experts,
> > >
> > > I have two USB-RS232 Adaptors, both with PL2303 chipset. One is working
> > > the other one not (I hate to say i
Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 16:17 schrieb Andrew L. Neporada:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > > Dear experts,
> > >
> > > I have two USB-RS232 Adaptors, both with PL2303 chipset. One is working
> > > the other one not (I hate to say i
Am Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005 16:17 schrieb Andrew L. Neporada:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> > Dear experts,
> >
> > I have two USB-RS232 Adaptors, both with PL2303 chipset. One is working
> > the other one not (I hate to say it but both are working under win).
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Andrew L. Neporada wrote:
> > The not working (more expensive) one gets recognized as ucom0 and I have
> > ucom0, also I can receive signal but not transmit.
> >
> [skip]
>
> Take a look at http://gate.intercaf.ru/~lesha/6100/ and try patch
> http://gate.intercaf.ru/~lesha/
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:06:43PM +0100, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
> Dear experts,
>
> I have two USB-RS232 Adaptors, both with PL2303 chipset. One is working the
> other one not (I hate to say it but both are working under win).
>
> The not working (more expensive) one gets recognized as ucom0 and
12 matches
Mail list logo
