Re: sio problems on 3.2

1999-07-21 Thread Greg Lynn
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, David Coder wrote: > I don't believe your mouse is on the first com port. If it were, the output > of "moused -i all -p /dev/cuaa0" would be "device busy." The message you got > is generated when there is nothing on the device at all. Check whether it > isn't on the second

Re: sio problems on 3.2

1999-07-21 Thread David Coder
I don't believe your mouse is on the first com port. If it were, the output of "moused -i all -p /dev/cuaa0" would be "device busy." The message you got is generated when there is nothing on the device at all. Check whether it isn't on the second com port. dc _ David Coder

Re: sio problems on 3.2

1999-07-21 Thread Kazutaka YOKOTA
>> Ok, the problem seems to be with the mouse, rather than the serial >> port. >> >> Give me some more details about your serial mouse. >> >> What model from which manufacuture is it? >> >> I suspect it's rather an old model, because moused should be able to >> detemine the protocol type if it

Re: sio problems on 3.2

1999-07-21 Thread Greg Lynn
> Ok, the problem seems to be with the mouse, rather than the serial > port. > > Give me some more details about your serial mouse. > > What model from which manufacuture is it? > > I suspect it's rather an old model, because moused should be able to > detemine the protocol type if it is one of

Re: sio problems on 3.2

1999-07-21 Thread Kazutaka YOKOTA
>I posted the other day about sio problems and >it seems that I'm still having trouble. Below >is various output for sio (cuaa0). I'm trying to >get the darn mouse to work ( to get X up and be done >with it!) but I'm running into problems. For one, >I can't seem to debug this problem so if AN