0n Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 04:27:51PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
>On 10/15/10 03:43, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>>
>> 0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:51:10PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>>
>> > 0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:13:27PM +0600, Sergey Nikolenko
wrote:
>>
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:27:51 +0200
Ivan Voras wrote:
> How stable is fuse & sshfs lately? It looks like every time in the past
> I tried it I soon ended up panicking the system.
Well, I use sshfs routinely to copy data between my machines, and have
done so for about a year.
Mostly small files (
On 10/15/10 03:43, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:51:10PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> 0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:13:27PM +0600, Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
>
> >On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> >> I have come across a bug tha
0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:51:10PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:13:27PM +0600, Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
>
>>On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>>> I have come across a bug that triggers a kernel panic on
8.1-STABLE(r213395) thr
0n Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 02:13:27PM +0600, Sergey Nikolenko wrote:
>On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
>> I have come across a bug that triggers a kernel panic on
8.1-STABLE(r213395) through the
>> use of /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs. Typically i do an sshfs mount
a
On 14.10.2010 09:26, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
I have come across a bug that triggers a kernel panic on 8.1-STABLE(r213395)
through the
use of /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-sshfs. Typically i do an sshfs mount as such:
#sshfs usern...@hostname:/home/username local_mountpoint/
This mounts the rem
Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote:
Please read the original thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-stable/2004-November/009307.html
I couldn't get a crashdump on this machine, but I provided a lot of
information (traces) in that thread.
Since no one replied to my last post in that thread, I d
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:48:02 -0800, Paul Saab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote:
>
> > I had a panic that looked a lot like this (panic in swi, came up when
> >
> >I had some network traffic), and it's also been reported by other
> >people than me. Turning of SACK seems to work
Jeff Behl wrote:
You're helpful reply doesn't seem to include any information on where
to upload a crash dump, if that's what is being asked. I haven't
dealt with them before. Perhaps you'd be so kind as to direct?
A reply that helps work around a problem is always welcome, especially
when it
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 07:27:32PM -0800, Jeff Behl wrote:
> You're helpful reply doesn't seem to include any information on where to
> upload a crash dump, if that's what is being asked. I haven't dealt
> with them before. Perhaps you'd be so kind as to direct?
>
> A reply that helps work aro
You're helpful reply doesn't seem to include any information on where to
upload a crash dump, if that's what is being asked. I haven't dealt
with them before. Perhaps you'd be so kind as to direct?
A reply that helps work around a problem is always welcome, especially
when it keeps a remotely
Arjan Van Leeuwen wrote:
I had a panic that looked a lot like this (panic in swi, came up when
I had some network traffic), and it's also been reported by other
people than me. Turning of SACK seems to work for most people (at
least it worked for me). Put net.inet.tcp.sack.enable=0 in
/etc/sysctl.c
On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:19:54 -0800, Jeff Behl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting a kernel panic every time I start getting traffic (~ 20Mb/s
> total) to two squid processes. This was not happening with -RELEASE. I
> upgraded on the advice that STABLE would decrease the %cpu spent in
> syste
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 01:19:54PM -0800, Jeff Behl wrote:
I'm getting a kernel panic every time I start getting traffic (~ 20Mb/s
total) to two squid processes. This was not happening with -RELEASE. I
upgraded on the advice that STABLE would decrease the %cpu spent in
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 01:19:54PM -0800, Jeff Behl wrote:
> I'm getting a kernel panic every time I start getting traffic (~ 20Mb/s
> total) to two squid processes. This was not happening with -RELEASE. I
> upgraded on the advice that STABLE would decrease the %cpu spent in
> system, which wa
15 matches
Mail list logo
