On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:10:03PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> On 04/06/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Chris wrote:
> >
> >> So my question remains when we have 7.0 and 6.3 both STABLE releases
> >> will the ports tree not be supported in 6.3 a just released version of
> >> FreeBSD?
> >
>
On 04/06/07, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris wrote:
> So my question remains when we have 7.0 and 6.3 both STABLE releases
> will the ports tree not be supported in 6.3 a just released version of
> FreeBSD?
I can't help but get the impression that you're spoiling for a fight
here,
>From Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:55:01PM -0700:
> Chris wrote:
>
> > So my question remains when we have 7.0 and 6.3 both STABLE releases
> > will the ports tree not be supported in 6.3 a just released version of
> > FreeBSD?
> You are focusing on released version num
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:17:17PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> On 02/06/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 02:02:44PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> >> Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > > On Tue, May
Chris wrote:
> So my question remains when we have 7.0 and 6.3 both STABLE releases
> will the ports tree not be supported in 6.3 a just released version of
> FreeBSD?
I can't help but get the impression that you're spoiling for a fight
here, so let me ask you to take step 1, which is relax a lit
On 02/06/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 02:02:44PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > > > Agreed. 6.3
On 02/06/07, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 2, 2007, at 3:45 , Chris wrote:
> Given that Kris repeatedly tells me and others that the ports system
> is only supported on the latest freebsd release (meaning one has to be
> upgrading freebsd on their servers every few
On 02/06/07, Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > > Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nominally be due around July but the lack
> > > of any sc
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 02:02:44PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > > > Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nominally be due around July but the lac
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 08:45:26AM +0100, Chris wrote:
> Given that Kris repeatedly tells me and others that the ports system
> is only supported on the latest freebsd release (meaning one has to be
> upgrading freebsd on their servers every few months to get this
> support) if 7.0 and 6.3 are rele
On Jun 2, 2007, at 3:45 , Chris wrote:
Given that Kris repeatedly tells me and others that the ports system
is only supported on the latest freebsd release (meaning one has to be
upgrading freebsd on their servers every few months to get this
support) if 7.0 and 6.3 are released around the same
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > > Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nominally be due around July but the lack
> > > of any schedule on http://www.freebsd.org/releng/ suggests that
On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nominally be due around July but the lack
> of any schedule on http://www.freebsd.org/releng/ suggests that it will
> be later than that. The plans to s
Scott Long wrote:
> Colin Percival wrote:
>> I point releases have been obsoleted by errata notices. In the past when
>> X.Y.Z-RELEASE has happened, it has been because of critical bugs in the
>> X.Y-RELEASE which there wasn't any other mechanism to fix. Now that we
>> have errata noticed and Fre
Colin Percival wrote:
Bruce A. Mah wrote:
We've done point releases in the past but only in cases where there were
severe problems and/or regressions with released versions. Look at the
announcements and release notes for 4.6.2-RELEASE and
5.2.1-RELEASE...these were the two most recent instance
On 05/29/07 17:26, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> And that's just the src/ part. The original poster was mostly concerned
> about the X.org upgrade, which as we all know lives in the ports/ tree.
> If we were to do a "point release" we'd basically require a complete
> port freeze and package build run. I
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nominally be due around July but the lack
> of any schedule on http://www.freebsd.org/releng/ suggests that it will
> be later than that. The plans to start the 7.0-RELEASE cycle will also
> impact this.
At
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:18:51PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
> Voker, I think with ports freeze still the case, they can't release a
> new version before sorting all Xorg 7.2 issues IMHO.
The freeze has been lifted. OTOH things are still settling down.
mcl
___
If memory serves me right, Colin Percival wrote:
> Bruce A. Mah wrote:
>> We've done point releases in the past but only in cases where there were
>> severe problems and/or regressions with released versions. Look at the
>> announcements and release notes for 4.6.2-RELEASE and
>> 5.2.1-RELEASE...t
Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> We've done point releases in the past but only in cases where there were
> severe problems and/or regressions with released versions. Look at the
> announcements and release notes for 4.6.2-RELEASE and
> 5.2.1-RELEASE...these were the two most recent instances where we did
>
If memory serves me right, LI Xin wrote:
> Hi, Erik,
>
> Erik Trulsson wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:45:15AM +0200, Volker wrote:
> [...]
>>> I know there's a release cycle for 7-CURRENT planned next June but
>>> IMHO it can be delayed for some weeks.
>>>
>>> What does the core and releng t
On 2007-May-29 12:29:29 +0200, Erik Trulsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A quick release cycle for a release from -STABLE sounds like a bad idea.
>There have been enough new things that have gone into the 6-STABLE branch
>that a full release cycle seems warranted.
Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nomina
Hi, Erik,
Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:45:15AM +0200, Volker wrote:
[...]
>>
>> I know there's a release cycle for 7-CURRENT planned next June but
>> IMHO it can be delayed for some weeks.
>>
>> What does the core and releng team think? It might do good.
>
> A quick release c
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:45:15AM +0200, Volker wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Reading some of the latest blog entries today, I've seen there has
> been some (newbie) user frustration with the latest X.org upgrade
> (mostly by not reading docs or not understanding the ports system at
> all). flz@ and des@ had
On 5/29/07, Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
While reading about all that latest trouble, I think it might not be a
bad idea to have a (quick) release cycle and release something like
6.2.1-RELEASE (6.3 is still TBA). I'm considering the latest X.org
upgrade being a major upgrade which wo
25 matches
Mail list logo
