On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=109277
The problem looks like a lack of proper locking during the operations with
clist (specifically, this causes multiple entry to cblock_alloc()).
I'm ready to provide further debugging information on
Hello!
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Not that it contradicts anything you said, but it's worth
re-emphasizing that there is apparently no-one in the community
interested in maintaining pppd on FreeBSD, which is how it got to the
current sorry state.
I agree that the absence of pp
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:31:47PM +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >Not that it contradicts anything you said, but it's worth
> >re-emphasizing that there is apparently no-one in the community
> >interested in maintaining pppd on FreeBS
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> There's information around PPP that's not been communicated or
> documented well. The 'performance' way to do PPP on FreeBSD is to go off
> and run MPD, because it has the right compromise between doing low-level
> packet shunting in the kernel
On Sunday, 11. February 2007 02:43, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> So far so good. The problem is that the BSD magicians and the KDE GUI
> magicians are not sharing their spell-books, and thus, their models of
> how the code operates; the communities have to intersect somehow. That
> could be you, y'kn
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
And yes, if pppd is broken and won't be fixed, it should disappear.
And when that happens, so will kppp (it won't build once the if_ppp.h header
is gone). Which of course would solve the problem in a way. In any case: I
dragged this issue onto -stable precisel
On Saturday, 10. February 2007 07:34, Ian Smith wrote:
> Since once trying (and failing) to debug or even comprehend a spaghetti
> of scripts and configs behind a dialout-only linux pppd setup some years
> ago, compared to the much more straightforward ppp with mgetty setup for
> both dialout and
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Thursday, 8. February 2007 08:38, Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 7. February 2007 18:45, Joe Vender wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 07 February 2007 01:59, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > >
On Thursday, 8. February 2007 08:38, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 7. February 2007 18:45, Joe Vender wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 07 February 2007 01:59, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > There is https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:38:08PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> Not to suggest that any pppd/kernel interaction problems ought not to be
> addressed by those wishing to maintain pppd for linux compatibility or
> other reasons, but the reality is that most FreeBSD users have long
> preferred user ppp
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Wednesday, 7. February 2007 18:45, Joe Vender wrote:
> > On Wednesday 07 February 2007 01:59, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > There is https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55785 on record, your
> > > description sounds more like y
11 matches
Mail list logo
