Ian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> > On 11.4.2011 6:08, Ian Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > As you see, total of differences for each cpu is here 89 ticks, but I've
> > > no idea of the interval between your two readings, or your value of HZ?
> >
> > the interval may hav
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> On 11.4.2011 6:08, Ian Smith wrote:
> >
> > As you see, total of differences for each cpu is here 89 ticks, but I've
> > no idea of the interval between your two readings, or your value of HZ?
>
> the interval may have been around 1-2 seconds.
> M
On 11.4.2011 6:08, Ian Smith wrote:
As you see, total of differences for each cpu is here 89 ticks, but I've
no idea of the interval between your two readings, or your value of HZ?
the interval may have been around 1-2 seconds.
My value of HZ is default, 1000.
Are those kern.cp_times values
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Daniel Ger?o wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I have a new machine with Xeon(R) CPU X5650 2666.77-MHz and I would like to
> utilize powerd(8) on it however, when I run `powerd -v -r90' I see something
> like this:
>
> load 64%, current freq 2668 MHz ( 0), wanted freq 5336 MHz
> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 09:57:28 +0200
> From: Daniel Gerzo
> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
>
> On 8.4.2011 19:52, Alexander Motin wrote:
>
> >> So, here is my attempt to implement it:
> >> http://danger.rulez.sk/powerd.diff
> >> Can you please review & comment? I should be able to c
On my Core i7 setup here, the change seems to work well.
... in your specific workload. And you haven't described how you
measured system performance to prove that it haven't decreased.
My measure of "performance" is entirely unscientific: This is a desktop
box. Performance is good if KDE rea
On 09.04.2011 17:39, Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
I just noticed this thread a day after my own fight with powerd and load
percentages that did not seem to make any sense.
The patch I came up with is attached. It modifies powerd to use the load
percentage of the busiest core. This reduces the rang
I just noticed this thread a day after my own fight with powerd and load
percentages that did not seem to make any sense.
The patch I came up with is attached. It modifies powerd to use the load
percentage of the busiest core. This reduces the range of values back to
0%...100% also for multi-c
On 09.04.2011 10:57, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
On 8.4.2011 19:52, Alexander Motin wrote:
So, here is my attempt to implement it:
http://danger.rulez.sk/powerd.diff
Can you please review & comment? I should be able to commit it mysqlf if
you consider it acceptable. It seems to work for me :)
Looks fi
On 8.4.2011 19:52, Alexander Motin wrote:
So, here is my attempt to implement it:
http://danger.rulez.sk/powerd.diff
Can you please review & comment? I should be able to commit it mysqlf if
you consider it acceptable. It seems to work for me :)
Looks fine, except that -f option have to be the
On 08.04.2011 19:53, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:02:28 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
OK, I understand what you are saying here. On the other side, I know
pretty well how the load is distributed - in this particular case, the
box is a web server, running ~30 php-cgi processes.
This
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:02:28 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
OK, I understand what you are saying here. On the other side, I know
pretty well how the load is distributed - in this particular case,
the
box is a web server, running ~30 php-cgi processes.
This kind of operation doesn't require very
On 08.04.2011 17:42, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:42:04 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
root@[s1-a ~]# powerd -v -r 1000 -i 600
powerd: 1000 is not a valid percent
Well, that makes sense, but why powerd itself knows about load > 100%
but doesn't allow me to specify it? Is this bug?
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:42:04 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hello Alexander, thanks for quick reply;
root@[s1-a ~]# powerd -v -r 1000 -i 600
powerd: 1000 is not a valid percent
Well, that makes sense, but why powerd itself knows about load >
100%
but doesn't allow me to specify it? Is this bu
Hi.
On 08.04.2011 14:12, Daniel Geržo wrote:
I have a new machine with Xeon(R) CPU X5650 2666.77-MHz and I would like
to utilize powerd(8) on it however, when I run `powerd -v -r90' I see
something like this:
load 64%, current freq 2668 MHz ( 0), wanted freq 5336 MHz
load 120%, current freq 266
15 matches
Mail list logo
