Doug Barton wrote:
> Skip Ford wrote:
>
> > So, basically, portmaster stopped and asked for input because it thought I
> > might've forgotten that I installed an +IGNOREME file 10 minutes prior.
> > I'd prefer to not have tools that try to "think" about what I'm doing.
> > It should do what I say
Skip Ford wrote:
> So, basically, portmaster stopped and asked for input because it thought I
> might've forgotten that I installed an +IGNOREME file 10 minutes prior.
> I'd prefer to not have tools that try to "think" about what I'm doing.
> It should do what I say it should do, not what it think
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:59:19 -0700
> > From: Doug Barton
> > Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
> >
> > Skip Ford wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, it wasn't immediately obvious to me that someone would ever want to
> > > mark a port ignore and then want to upgrade it. S
Doug Barton wrote:
> Skip Ford wrote:
> > Doug Barton wrote:
> >> Second, without knowing what command line you used I couldn't tell you
> >> for sure what happened of course, but assuming you used some
> >> combination of '-af' what you saw was expected behavior. There is a
> >> conflict (I think
On Wed, August 26, 2009 16:51, Doug Barton wrote:
> Troels Kofoed Jacobsen wrote:
>
>> For some reason portmaster will not build kBuild or ports building with
>> kBuild
>> (such as virtulabox). However a manual make install clean works fine for
>> me. I
>> guess it's a bug in portmaster.
>
> Don't
> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:59:19 -0700
> From: Doug Barton
> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
>
> Skip Ford wrote:
> > Doug Barton wrote:
> >> Yes, unfortunately it's not omniscient. :)
> >
> > Well, to be honest, it wouldn't need to be. It would just need a flag
> > to know when nobod
Skip Ford wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> Yes, unfortunately it's not omniscient. :)
>
> Well, to be honest, it wouldn't need to be. It would just need a flag
> to know when nobody is present from whom to request input, and then take
> the default action.
That's never going to happen. The defaul
Troels Kofoed Jacobsen wrote:
> For some reason portmaster will not build kBuild or ports building with
> kBuild
> (such as virtulabox). However a manual make install clean works fine for me.
> I
> guess it's a bug in portmaster.
Don't guess. :) The bug is in kBuild. Portmaster makes heavy u
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 05:34:11 Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:28:48 -0700
>
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> > > that's just what I was looking for. after the library bumps that
> > > happened after BETA2, I'd like to rebuild all :)
> >
> > There is an extensive
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:28:48 -0700
Doug Barton wrote:
> Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>
> > that's just what I was looking for. after the library bumps that happened
> > after BETA2, I'd like to rebuild all :)
>
> There is an extensive writeup in the EXAMPLES section of the man page
> on how to rebuild
Doug Barton wrote:
> Skip Ford wrote:
> > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> >> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
> >> Doug Barton wrote:
> >>
> >>> It sounds to me like what you're seeing is portmaster asking whether
> >>> or not you want to delete the distfiles after an upgrade. The easiest
> >>> way to de
Skip Ford wrote:
> Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>
>>> It sounds to me like what you're seeing is portmaster asking whether
>>> or not you want to delete the distfiles after an upgrade. The easiest
>>> way to deal with that is to use '-aD' and th
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
> Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > It sounds to me like what you're seeing is portmaster asking whether
> > or not you want to delete the distfiles after an upgrade. The easiest
> > way to deal with that is to use '-aD' and then when it's done use
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> that's just what I was looking for. after the library bumps that happened
> after BETA2, I'd like to rebuild all :)
There is an extensive writeup in the EXAMPLES section of the man page
on how to rebuild all of your ports. I don't actually recommend that
people use '-af' f
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
Doug Barton wrote:
> Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> > hail,
> >
> > portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a
> > portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it asks
> > this. is ther any way to make it not ask ? d
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Just in case someone reads this and tries 'portupgrade -af', it also
> will re-build all installed ports, whether they need upgrading. This is
> the command to re-build ALL ports when the library versions get bumped
> (as they did recently for 8.0BETA).
>
> To just update t
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700
> From: Doug Barton
> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
>
> Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> > hail,
> >
> > portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a
> > portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it as
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> hail,
>
> portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a
> portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it asks
> this. is ther any way to make it not ask ? delete and go ahead ?
You really want to read the man page thoroughl
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:03:40PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> hail,
>
> portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a
> portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it asks
> this. is ther any way to make it not ask ? delete and go ahead ?
>
>
On Mon, August 24, 2009 12:06, Marc Olzheim wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:03:40PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>> hail,
>>
>> portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire
>> a
>> portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it
>> asks
>> this.
20 matches
Mail list logo
