On 29/12/2007, Dave Overton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fixed.
>
> For reference, it was squid, happily caching the data for me.
>
> Makes one wonder why the portsnap and portaudit servers or clients aren't
> http compliant if they use http protocols... Especially since the author of
> portsnap su
Fixed.
For reference, it was squid, happily caching the data for me.
Makes one wonder why the portsnap and portaudit servers or clients aren't
http compliant if they use http protocols... Especially since the author of
portsnap suggests a cache server for speed
Oh well...
Dave Overton, Owne
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 11:22:18AM -0800, Dave Overton wrote:
> Portaudit does this:
> # portaudit -Fa
> auditfile.tbz 100% of 46 kB 6001 kBps
> portaudit: Database too old.
> Old database restored.
> portaudit: Download failed.
>
>
> Portsnap does this:
> #
On Mon 2007-08-27 (17:09), Chuck Swiger wrote:
> This might imply that your system clock on that machine is wrong...?
> Double-check what it thinks is the date.
date and time is synced.
> Also, make sure you don't have some old version stuck in an intervening
> proxy, if such is being used.
i
On Aug 27, 2007, at 1:08 PM, gareth wrote:
hey guys, for over a month i haven't been able to get a copy of the
portaudit db. no-one else seems to be having this problem.
this's what happens:
# portaudit -F
auditfile.tbz 100% of 43 kB 1045
kBps
portaudit: Dat
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:55:50PM +0100, Stephane Thomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore because of
> three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if
> there are knows vulnerabilities ? I guess I can add some portaudi
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:55:50 +0100
"Stephane Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore because of
> three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if
> there are knows vulnerabilities ? I guess I can ad
Stephane Thomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just installed portaudit and now I cannot build mozilla anymore
> because of
> three vulnerabilities. Is there a way to force building of a port even if
> there are knows vulnerabilities ?
After 'man 7 ports':
% ENVIRONMENT
% [...]
% DISABLE_VULNERABILI
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
[...]
Hello.
What are other ways?
I want to see vulnerable message but still want to install
without portupgrade being interrupted.
According to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes
disables vulnerable check, don't it?
Yes, it disable vulnerability check
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:03:55 +0200
Miroslav Lachman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gareth wrote:
>
> There are more than one way to install vulnerable port. Sometimes
> DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes may be enough.
Hello.
What are other ways?
I want to see vulnerable message but still want to insta
On Sun 2006-10-22 (19:33), Ronald Klop wrote:
> You can set DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=true in the environment.
> In bash it is:
> export DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=true
thanx ;)
> But know what you are doing. I do not recommend you to install vulnerable
> ports.
yes i don't feel to easy about it, m
On Sun 2006-10-22 (20:03), Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> There are more than one way to install vulnerable port. Sometimes
> DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes may be enough.
thanx, that did the trick.
> Permissions denied may be caused by your file system mount options - if
> you have /var (/var/db/pkg)
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:10:44 +0200, gareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi, i want to install a port but portaudit won't let me because it
"has known vulnerabilities".
You can set DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=true in the environment.
In bash it is:
export DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=true
See /usr/ports/
gareth wrote:
hi, i want to install a port but portaudit won't let me because it
"has known vulnerabilities".
trying to tell it it's ok with 'portaudit_fixed' in
/usr/local/etc/portaudit.conf doesn't work, and trying to deinstall
portaudit:
/usr/ports/security/portaudit# make deinstall
===> D
14 matches
Mail list logo
