On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 08:01:31PM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:04:54AM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> >>Is there a reason this change was made? And is there a reason why
> >
> >The change wasn't against NETSMBCRYPTO, it jus
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:04:54AM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
Is there a reason this change was made? And is there a reason why
The change wasn't against NETSMBCRYPTO, it just corrected the way
kernel modules get their options.
NETSMBCRYPTO is not i
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:04:54AM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 19:29 +0800, Tai-hwa Liang wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Bachilo Dmitry wrote:
> > > I've cvsuped from 6.0 to 6.1-PRERELEASE and now I can't mount NT's shares
> > > with
> > > password. It worked fine before,
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 19:29 +0800, Tai-hwa Liang wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Bachilo Dmitry wrote:
I've cvsuped from 6.0 to 6.1-PRERELEASE and now I can't mount NT's shares with
password. It worked fine before, but after cvsup i get
mount_smbfs: unable to open con
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 19:29 +0800, Tai-hwa Liang wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Bachilo Dmitry wrote:
> > I've cvsuped from 6.0 to 6.1-PRERELEASE and now I can't mount NT's shares
> > with
> > password. It worked fine before, but after cvsup i get
> > mount_smbfs: unable to open connection: syserr
