Re: digital camera

2001-05-18 Thread david
Chad R. Larson wrote: > Mine is the earlier Mavica that writes to floppies. Very handy. It > can make image copies of floppies, so you can leave a set of > Thanksgiving pictures with the relatives. > > But with today's multi-megapixel CCDs, a regular floppy won't cut > it. Perhaps an LS-120?

Re: digital camera

2001-05-18 Thread Mike Meyer
sfer the pictures, and you're done. For quality, using a film camera and getting it scanned to Photo CD from the negative gets you excellent resolution, and skips the step of going to paper first, and all the extra noise that can entail. - Jordan > > From: "Leland" &l

Re: digital camera

2001-05-17 Thread Jordan Hubbard
s pictures back (she's hopelessly wedded to the analog), we just get it on PhotoCD as well. - Jordan From: "Leland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: digital camera Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 22:00:47 -0700 > > A cheap film camera and a scanner is still a better deal. >

Re: digital camera

2001-05-17 Thread Leland
A cheap film camera and a scanner is still a better deal. > I'm thinking of finally getting a digital camera. > > Is there one that seems to do "better" with freebsd? > > What about the software to move the pic(s) to the pc? > Most of the cams seem to include "Windows connectivity" kits. > Since