Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-07 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, 2005-Dec-07 15:39:04 -0800, Ed wrote: >With all due respect, "vmware plays fast and loose with the clocks" is not >a satisfactory technical explanation. Hi-jacking unrelated e-mail threads and top posting is not good etiquette either. >It is no doubt true that those of us who run FreeBSD

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 04:23:04PM -0800, Ed wrote: > My apologies, I did not understand this specific meaning of "core team" > when I wrote that. > > What term should I use in the future, when discussing problems of this > nature? "FreeBSD kernel developers," or some such? "FreeBSD developers"

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-07 Thread Ed
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Peter Jeremy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 4:03 PM Subject: Re: cpu-timer rate ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list htt

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 03:39:04PM -0800, Ed wrote: > > For these reasons, I believe your technically unsupported assertion that > "This is nothing to do with the core team" should be shelved, pending > actual investigation of the phenomenon. Peter's assertion is entirely correct. You misunder

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-07 Thread Ed
single-processor systems, and that this is a change from 5.x. - Original Message - From: "Peter Jeremy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 10:22 AM Subject: Re: cpu-timer rate On Wed, 2005-Dec-07 0

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-07 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, 2005-Dec-07 03:51:47 -0800, Ed wrote: >I certainly do not have a full understanding of the interactions between >the various FreeBSD software timers and i386 hardware clocks, but I do know >this is not the first time we've seen a problem with the APIC/ACPI >timers/clocks. You have a tot

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-07 Thread Ed
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ; "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:17 PM Subject: Re: cpu-timer rate On Mon, 2005-Dec-05 10:15:52 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:42:08AM +0100 I heard the voice of kama, and lo! it s

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-06 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Mon, 2005-Dec-05 10:15:52 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:42:08AM +0100 I heard the voice of >> kama, and lo! it spake thus: >> > >> > I appreciate that you took time to answer about the different >> > clocks. But that does not answer why vmstat -i shows a rate of 2000

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-06 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Friday, 2 December 2005 at 14:32:58 +0100, kama wrote: > > Hi, > > I am just wondering why the cpu-timer is doubled from what I set in > kern.hz? > > # vmstat -i > ... > cpu0: timer 14314031 1999 > > # sysctl -a | grep hz > kern.clockrate: { hz = 1000, tick = 1000, pro

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-05 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:47:56 -0600 > From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 10:15:52AM -0800 I heard the voice of > Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus: > > > From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Because the rate is always twice hz. > >

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-05 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 10:15:52AM -0800 I heard the voice of Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus: > > From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Because the rate is always twice hz. > > While I will concede that I have no explanation, but on all of my > systems rate = HZ +/-1. I have

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-05 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:49:10 -0600 > From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:42:08AM +0100 I heard the voice of > kama, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > I appreciate that you took time to answer about the different > > clocks. But

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-05 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:42:08AM +0100 I heard the voice of kama, and lo! it spake thus: > > I appreciate that you took time to answer about the different > clocks. But that does not answer why vmstat -i shows a rate of 2000 > when I have set the hz to 1000. Because the rate is always twice hz.

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-05 Thread kama
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Fri, 2005-Dec-02 14:32:58 +0100, kama wrote: > >I am just wondering why the cpu-timer is doubled from what I set in > >kern.hz? > > > ># vmstat -i > >interrupt total rate > ... > >cpu0: timer 14314031

Re: cpu-timer rate

2005-12-02 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Fri, 2005-Dec-02 14:32:58 +0100, kama wrote: >I am just wondering why the cpu-timer is doubled from what I set in >kern.hz? > ># vmstat -i >interrupt total rate ... >cpu0: timer 14314031 1999 >Total 14750922