On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 02:24:14 +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
> sorry for the buzz...
>
> 2012/9/26 Brandon Allbery
>
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Michael Schuh
> > wrote:
> >
> >> hmm, may be.
> >> i didn't thinked about that lithium charging feature.
> >> you may right with that.
sorry for the buzz...
2012/9/26 Brandon Allbery
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Michael Schuh wrote:
>
>> hmm, may be.
>> i didn't thinked about that lithium charging feature.
>> you may right with that.
>>
>
>
Yes you are right with that point.
I have watched batteries cycle like that on OS
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Michael Schuh wrote:
> hmm, may be.
> i didn't thinked about that lithium charging feature.
> you may right with that.
>
I have watched batteries cycle like that on OS X, Linux, and FreeBSD, and
some versions of Windows; possibly more recent versions try to hide i
2012/9/26 Brandon Allbery
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Michael Schuh wrote:
>
>> this wrong number seems persistent during a reboot.
>> i tested this, shortly.
>> the battery life after reboot was 97% with power supply plugged in all the
>> times.
>>
>> after a clean boot the system camed u
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Michael Schuh wrote:
> this wrong number seems persistent during a reboot.
> i tested this, shortly.
> the battery life after reboot was 97% with power supply plugged in all the
> times.
>
> after a clean boot the system camed up with a battery.life of 97% ( power
On 16/08/2012 12:41, Ian Smith wrote:> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:24:46 +0200,
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 16/08/2012 07:39, Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:40:26 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > ...
> > I found your correspondence here last December about that, "Re: battery
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:24:46 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 16/08/2012 07:39, Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:40:26 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > ...
> > I found your correspondence here last December about that, "Re: battery
> > display broken". Looks like it's still the
On 16/08/2012 07:39, Ian Smith wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:40:26 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
...
I found your correspondence here last December about that, "Re: battery
display broken". Looks like it's still the same problem, you were on
9-stable then too. When did it used to work?
Hmm,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:40:26 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 15/08/2012 11:16, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> > On 2012-08-15 11:07, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Dominic Fandrey
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 15/08/2012 10:40, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Au
On 15/08/2012 11:07, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 15/08/2012 10:40, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Dominic Fandrey
wrote:
For a while now "acpiconf -i0" always shows the battery state that
was correct when boo
On 15/08/2012 11:16, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2012-08-15 11:07, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 15/08/2012 10:40, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Dominic Fandrey
wrote:
For a while now "acpiconf -i0" always shows the
On 2012-08-15 11:07, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> On 15/08/2012 10:40, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Dominic Fandrey >>> wrote:
For a while now "acpiconf -i0" always shows the battery state that
was cor
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 15/08/2012 10:40, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Dominic Fandrey > >wrote:
>>
>>> For a while now "acpiconf -i0" always shows the battery state that
>>> was correct when booting the system. It's never upda
On 15/08/2012 10:40, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
For a while now "acpiconf -i0" always shows the battery state that
was correct when booting the system. It's never updated.
snip
It wont solve the problem, but does the sysctl hw.acpi.battery.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> For a while now "acpiconf -i0" always shows the battery state that
> was correct when booting the system. It's never updated.
>
> snip
It wont solve the problem, but does the sysctl hw.acpi.battery.time update
correctly?
Best regards
And
15 matches
Mail list logo