On 1/11/2011 11:10 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 11/01/2011 03:38, Dan Langille wrote:
On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 04/01/2011 03:08, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to discover if ZFS under FreeBSD will automatically pull
in a
hot spare if one is required.
T
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Did a little research. In at least the ZFS case, it appears that events are
> available through devctl(4) and are therefore accessible through devd:
>
> http://2007.asiabsdcon.org/papers/P16-paper.pdf - section 3.7
PC-BSD has the following
On 01/13/11 09:42, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Boris Kochergin (from Wed, 12 Jan 2011
19:50:41 -0500):
On 01/12/11 19:32, Chris Forgeron wrote:
Solaris runs a separate process called Fault Management Daemon (fmd)
that looks to handle this logic - This means that it's really not
ins
Quoting Boris Kochergin (from Wed, 12 Jan 2011
19:50:41 -0500):
On 01/12/11 19:32, Chris Forgeron wrote:
Solaris runs a separate process called Fault Management Daemon
(fmd) that looks to handle this logic - This means that it's really
not inside the ZFS code to handle this, and FreeBSD
[mailto:owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Boris Kochergin
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:51 PM
To: Chris Forgeron
Cc: freebsd-stable
Subject: Re: ZFS - hot spares : automatic or not?
>After a cursory glance at their fault-management infrastructure, I
>noticed that it
On 01/12/11 19:32, Chris Forgeron wrote:
Interesting, I was just testing Solaris 11 Express's ability to handle a pulled
drive today. It handles it quite well. However, my Areca 1880 drive (arcmsr0)
crashes when you reinsert the drive.. but that's another topic, and an issue
for Areca tech sup
sd-sta...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of John Hawkes-Reed
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:11 PM
To: Dan Langille
Cc: freebsd-stable
Subject: Re: ZFS - hot spares : automatic or not?
On 11/01/2011 03:38, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
>> On 04/0
On 11/01/2011 03:38, Dan Langille wrote:
On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 04/01/2011 03:08, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to discover if ZFS under FreeBSD will automatically pull in a
hot spare if one is required.
This raised the issue back in March 2010, and ref
Dan Langille wrote:
On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
[...]
As far as our testing could discover, it's not automatic.
I wrote some Ugly Perl that's called by devd when it spots a drive-fail
event, which seemed to DTRT when simulating a failure by pulling a drive.
Without such
On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 04/01/2011 03:08, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to discover if ZFS under FreeBSD will automatically pull in a
hot spare if one is required.
This raised the issue back in March 2010, and refers to a PR opened in
May 2009
* http://l
On 04/01/2011 03:08, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to discover if ZFS under FreeBSD will automatically pull in a
hot spare if one is required.
This raised the issue back in March 2010, and refers to a PR opened in
May 2009
* http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2010-Marc
On 03/09/10 05:11, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 03/08/10 19:06, Steve Polyack wrote:
ZFS in FreeBSD lacks at least one major feature from the Solaris
version: hot spares. There is a PR open at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=134491, but there hasn't been
any motion/thoughts posted on it since
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:06:10PM -0500, Steve Polyack wrote:
> ZFS in FreeBSD lacks at least one major feature from the Solaris
> version: hot spares. There is a PR open at
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=134491, but there hasn't been
> any motion/thoughts posted on it since its
13 matches
Mail list logo
