> >
> > This is a pet peeve of mine. Freebsd-stable is supposed to be the mailing
> > list that is required reading for anyone tracking stable, where all useful
> > information related to tracking stable is to be found.
> >
> > However, the list is increasingly such a high-volume, low signal-to
--- Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Richard Stanaford wrote:
>
> > I will probably need to pull most of the src tree in order to go
> > STABLE from 4.0-RELEASE and that is a seven hour download across a 56K
> > dialup connection... a significant investment of time.
On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Richard Stanaford wrote:
> I will probably need to pull most of the src tree in order to go
> STABLE from 4.0-RELEASE and that is a seven hour download across a 56K
> dialup connection... a significant investment of time. So you can
> understand my caution.
Well, suppose you
--- David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 05:04:09PM -0700, Richard Stanaford wrote:
> > If I remember correctly I saw a HEADS UP regarding STABLE being broken for
> a
> > while until something was fixed. I have, therefore, been holding off
> grabbing
> > the latest S
