On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 09:04:50PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 07:07:20PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> ...
> > $ unset LANG
> > - Result: still 80x slower with -i
> > $ unset LANG LC_COLLATE
> > - Result: still 80x slower with -i
> > $ unset LANG LC_CTYPE
> > -
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 07:07:20PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
...
> $ unset LANG
> - Result: still 80x slower with -i
> $ unset LANG LC_COLLATE
> - Result: still 80x slower with -i
> $ unset LANG LC_CTYPE
> - Result: normal/fast.
> $ unset LC_CTYPE
> - Result: still 80x slower with -i
>
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 09:46:04PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:45:14PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > This is a strange one, and the more I started debugging it (starting
> > with truss, comparing fast vs. slow results, where all that appears
> > different is read() op
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:45:14PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> This is a strange one, and the more I started debugging it (starting
> with truss, comparing fast vs. slow results, where all that appears
> different is read() operations are taking a lot longer -- I haven't had
> time to check wit
On 5 March 2011 21:05, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 08:49:46PM -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 5 March 2011 20:43, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:01:40PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:45:14PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 08:49:46PM -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 5 March 2011 20:43, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:01:40PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:45:14PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >> > This is a strange one, and the more I
On 5 March 2011 20:43, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:01:40PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:45:14PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> > This is a strange one, and the more I started debugging it (starting
>> > with truss, comparing fast vs. slow re
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:01:40PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:45:14PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > This is a strange one, and the more I started debugging it (starting
> > with truss, comparing fast vs. slow results, where all that appears
> > different is read(
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 03:45:14PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> This is a strange one, and the more I started debugging it (starting
> with truss, comparing fast vs. slow results, where all that appears
> different is read() operations are taking a lot longer -- I haven't had
> time to check wit