I had written (2015-Oct-11):
> I'm not sure about going all the way back to FreeBSD 9 but this suggests that
> clang was for some time --and recently has been-- insufficient on its own for
> reliable(?) powerpc64 builds (2015-Feb-05). It may be best to consider
> powerpc64 omitted from the "cla
On 11 Oct 2015, at 14:05, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
>
> AFAIK if there had been such plans, they were dropped long ago. The
> reasoning it can't be done (at least for now) is that versions 3.5.0+
> require C++11-capable stack and that would break upgrades from 9-STABLE
> (if the user still uses GCC, as
AFAIK if there had been such plans, they were dropped long ago. The
reasoning it can't be done (at least for now) is that versions 3.5.0+
require C++11-capable stack and that would break upgrades from 9-STABLE
(if the user still uses GCC, as is by default). So, LLVM in stable/10
will probably be up
