On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Raphael Becker wrote:
> PS: In gerneral I find it very useful to operate on labels instead of
> "legacy" device names, especially for S-SATA disks. I even use
> /dev/ufs/ROOT instead of /dev/ads1a which works perfectly:
I advise you to preface the label with the hostname.
It
Raphael Becker wrote:
> How would one get the ids of ufsid-labels when hidden? glabel list shows
> only the "active" labels, especially doesn't show the ufsid-label if the
> device is mounted by its "legacy" devicename (just tried that). dmesg
> seems the only source of information for that so
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 01:52:27AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
[Labels apperaring ad disappearing]
> Now Glabel is complaining you didn't use a label and have used a device
> node as the mount point :)
This isn't new (to me). Having ufs-labelled md-devices brings me those
messages since 6.x (since
Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Just an FYI, i am also seeing this on a recent cvsup.
> Apr 8 14:27:15 iwinbackdb kernel: GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider mfid0s1a
> is ufsid/49c7c009b41af703.
Glabel is telling you you can abandon mounting device nodes and can use
labels for it.
> Apr 8 14:27:15 iwinbackd
Just an FYI, i am also seeing this on a recent cvsup.
Apr 8 14:27:15 iwinbackdb kernel: ACPI APIC Table:
Apr 8 14:27:15 iwinbackdb kernel: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System
Detected: 4 CPUs
...
Apr 8 14:27:15 iwinbackdb kernel: GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider mfid0s1a
is ufsid/49c7c009b41af703
